TechTakes
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
Nah, rotoscoping is too "arty" for them. Can you even call a movie animated if it doesn't look like "Cars?"
Cars looks better than any AI slop, tho that’s a low bar.
Do studio executives universally suffer from aphantasia or what?
Studio executives, the people who seek to monetise every aspect of creativity, as if they cannot appreciate or see the intangible value of art that is uncorrupted by commerce? Hard to say if they have aphantasia. No way to tell
"Mr. Burns" -- too on the nose. Try better, scriptwriters.
Using Runaway’s AI technology, the studio can avoid a pricy film shoot that would cost millions and take a few days and use AI to create the shot for about $10,000.
"I have been in this business long enough to become vice chairman. What is this "CGI" you speak of?"
(not sure you can get that sort of shot for less than $10K but you don't have to literally go out an shoot on film/digital actors and shit)
Also: if it were possible to create a shot for much cheaper, what is the point of a studio?
My understanding is that you never make a movie with your own money because A. it’s expensive and B. you will probably make a loss, so you go to studios to try sell the film. They also understand A. and B., but they can use that as leverage against you for owning various rights of your production, in case it goes well, and otherwise to tie you down with contracts so they can force you to do their bidding. Making film production cheaper weakens the power of studios- the only card they’ll have to play is distribution, which is dying anyway thanks to the streaming ghouls.
So that's why John Wick was so confusing.