this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
42 points (90.4% liked)

YUROP

87 readers
263 users here now

Welcome to YUROP
The Ultimate Eurozone of Culture, Chaos, and Continental Excellence

A glorious gathering place to celebrate (and lovingly roast) the lands, peoples, quirks, and contradictions of Her Most Magnificent Europa. From the fjords to the Med, the steppes to the Atlantic spray, this is a shrine to everything that makes Europe gloriously weird, wonderfully diverse, and occasionally passive-aggressive in 24 languages.

Here we toast:
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί The progressive Union of Peace (and paperwork)
πŸ§€ The freest of health care
🍷 The finest of foods
πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ The liberalest of liberties
🌍 The proud non-members and honorary cousins πŸ’Ά And the eternal dance of unity, confusion, and cultural banter.

Post memes, news, satire, linguistic wars, train maps, cursed food photos, Eurovision fever, propaganda and whatever makes you scream β€œonly in YUROP.”

Leave your stereotypes at the border control and enjoy the ride.

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and maybe someone else: No! We like the situation as it is.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Wait, which EU country is China threatening?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Every other country by being the fastest arming country in the world? And also being a dictatorship.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

and also buying other countries infrastructure (ports, sewers, etc) and supplying backdoored communication infrastructure

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

developing the global south is a win in my book, but backdoors are obviously bad, though it seems less of a downside than what the west provides

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

they aren't just doing that in the global south tho. they do it in EU too, for example

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

What am I meant to say? They shouldn't have bought Chinese or privatised their infrastructure if it was that big of a deal

Besides, the only solution is local alternatives, USA does the same as China

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

What am I meant to say?

you're not meant to say anything specific. this is how freedom works.

They shouldn't have bought Chinese or privatised their infrastructure if it was that big of a deal

you're right, they shouldn't have, but corruption is unfortunately a thing and now what you wrote feels a bit like victim blaming πŸ˜„

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 38 minutes ago

The victim is the government and they usually have a board to talk things through, it would be different if it was an individual decision

[–] Finch9678@europe.pub 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So the US also threatens the whole of the the world by being the most heavily armed county in the world and also slipping into a dictatorship right?

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

...yes? Was that in question?

[–] Finch9678@europe.pub -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Not a question exactly, more of questioning the implicit bias towards US hegemony.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"Whatabout the USA"

It's so tiring everything critical of russia or china being immediately met with that fallacy "argument".

[–] Finch9678@europe.pub 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Well sorry, but I am from Eastern Europe, I am regularly fucked by US and Russian political interests, while the only local things connected to China are how many factories are built.... So yeah fuck the US.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 hour ago

I'm tired of "but when america does it it's ok???"-"arguments. No, it's not. It never was. But that's not the fucking argument when we're talking about China or Russia. And the same is true vice versa. Leave it, ffs!

[–] zout@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

China is doing a lot of sneaky stuff in the EU (and elsewhere), like operating illegal police stations or have state owned companies acquire critical infrastructure.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

operating illegal police stations

No evidence of secret Chinese police stations

have state owned companies acquire critical infrastructure

Europe privatizing its critical infrastructure and trading their controlling shares on the open market is not "Chinese" problem.

What's more, it certainly isn't a military threat, when the capital itself is still firmly within the sovereign domain of the host country. European states are well within their power to re-nationalize these privatized companies. They just won't do that because it threatens the interests of their domestic oligarchs who own the preponderance of outstanding shares.