Oof. It does not look good, especially pausing on videos and the rest of the video ui. Why change it from their current design? I think this current design is the best OS design out of any OS ever. Now they’re just wrecking it.
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
27 points (75.5% liked)
Apple
18933 readers
205 users here now
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Running iOS developer beta here. No mi gusta.
Protip: if you requested the 26 beta and are regretting that rash decision... Reboot, then hop back into update settings and change it back to off. Thankfully, it resets and now you can wait out the far more sensible 0.2 beta, where they've ironed out the crazy kinks.
Oh man that looks bad. Hopefully that’s like something going wrong in the beta version because I can’t see them shipping something that looks like that
The UI elements are totally working as designed, but they’re 100% going to need to change the blur and opacity. This is embarrassing.
It’s not embarrassing, it’s a beta. This will 100% get better over the months. It always does.
sorry buddy but it's "me" not "mi"...
LFMAO blur radius needs to be lots higher
Agreed. It just looks so busy with all of the background details.
I guess that's the flaw with this design language. It looks kinda cool, but the effect is not very pronounced unless there are clear background details for it to do its whole refraction thing over. But then when there's too much background detail, it makes the actual foreground interface harder to read.
I don't hate it per se, but I think it's just an unnecessary step backwards from the design languages popular today. But what I know I'm really going to hate is that now everyone is going to be trying to copy Apple's design language, and we are teetering back towards the bubbly, glossy, skeuomorphic design of Frutiger Aero from the mid 00's.
As some one who dœsn't particularly care for frutiger æro , I at least hope peops do some thing (new|original) with this glass effect
Wonder what it'd lꝏk like if they still mimicked how glass worked in real life but used some thing like frosted glass for it for elements where readability's important . Can maybe see tiny bits of refraction here : 
WIN10 ACRYLIC MENTIONED
...used before they frankensteined in the fluent around win11's rollout 😔
That looks closer to where things are today, with a lot of mainstream UIs that aren't quite superflat going for that frosted, acrylic sort of aesthetic. Translucent but not transparent.
Examples from Windows 11 and iOS 18:
See also some of the transparency and active transparency in KDE 5 (and friends): https://discuss.kde.org/t/krusader-and-kvantum-transparency/17533
Vista called and wants it’s ugly back
Well said lol
What the fuck are you talking about? Vista and especially 7 were the best looking windows versions, unlike the flat and dull metro design of 8-10.
I see this opinion more and more as Gen Z starts joining vintage PC spaces. I don’t know if I agree (well I do agree that windows 8 and 10 suck), I always set the theme to classic and turned off aero first thing when using vista/7
Probably because it’s what a lot of us grew up with. My childhood was dominated by XP and by the time I was a semi-regular PC user, 7 was the state of the art. I remember trying to make the XP installation on my old laptop look more like Vista.
I never liked the classic windows look. It’s so dull and grey.
Ah crap, it just reminds me of Windows Vista.
Also, having buttons and controls on transparent backgrounds makes things harder to read / discern.
The the lock screen however is a nice Apple-esque touch.
I want to lick it.
snozzberries taste like snozzberries.
I don’t hate it. It’s just not a priority that I was interested in. For instance maybe revert the Photos app to its old goodness, rather than its new crapness. Maybe even expand usage cases for the dynamic island, since they’ve had so much time to do so and seem to have lost interest.
DuckDuckGo summary: “Liquid Glass is a new design language introduced by Apple for its operating systems, including iOS 26, which features a translucent and dynamic interface that adapts to content and lighting. This design aims to create a more unified and visually appealing experience across all Apple devices.”
I just want to know what happened with the other 6 iOS versions. They got lost on the way up!
Its moving to a calendar based naming scheme ig
It makes sense for me. Thanks!
Just switching to annual numbers and a uniform version number system for all their operating systems. iOS, iPadOS, tvOS, MacOS, visionOS, watchOS, HomePod, etc.
They should’ve done this years ago. They have too many damn operating systems and platforms now.
Reminds me of Project Looking Glass which was terrible compared to Compiz.
I think I remember running that on a Live CD that came with a Linux magazine.
Bloody hell I’m old.