this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3129 readers
787 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting as the Californian National Guard is supposed to be under the control of the Governor not the President.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The federal government does have a mechanism to activate a states national guard without a states input, but doing so activates them as Title 10 which means they basically turn into regular military personnel as opposed to a "states militia".

But that means they are also activated with all the rules and restrictions that come with being active under Title 10, which Drump is ofc ignoring.

Iirc, the intent for the mechanism is so the federal government can use state militias as a sort of emergency reserve unit OR if a states government has become non-functional because of a disaster/emergency whatever