this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1797 readers
42 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

To be clear, they're cutting an extra $9.4 Billion in services. Maybe it's used differently in British English but in the US "claw back" as an idiom generally refers to a win for an underdog party to keep something after a difficult fight, not a privileged party ending access to something.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

around here, I generally seen it used to indicate taking money that has already been deposited with the recipient.

[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

Whoever wrote the title was just trying to insinuate something extra vicious and violent in nature. It's a common part of our fair and unbiased media.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

That's not at all what that means.

Claw back implies money (or something else) has already been sent out and is trying to once again be retrieved from the receiving party.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

This is just completely incorrect. Claw back in no way suggests an underdog.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Informed Americans are a threat to American conservatives and/or Republicans: it's best to keep them stupid.