this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
469 points (99.0% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1121 readers
1394 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/Smurfs25 At 2025-06-17 01:57:40 PM | Source


top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago

Lol Ted Cruz still gobbling up scraps. Texas sure does love absolute weak ass politicians lol

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Fun random Comcast fact: founder Ralph Roberts, famous for wearing a bow-tie (and infamous for other reasons) died in 2015. My then-boss, a Comcast veep, decided to wear a bow-tie to the memorial service. He was fired a week later. When an executive is fired at Comcast, they just instantly disappear around lunchtime and are never seen or heard from again or even mentioned by anybody. I'm not entirely certain they're not killed and dissolved in acid.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 26 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Surely she will win the 2028 Democratic Primary.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

a man can dream.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ca 26 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Tech was better in 2015. It's all corporate squeeze now.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 20 hours ago

Remember when Google participated in the blackouts to protest SOPA and PIPA? How things have changed...

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Has enshittification noticeably increased across the entire Internet in the past 10 years? Yes.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago

Would repealing the current net neutrality rules make enshittification even worse? Definitely. It would hand ISPs even more control over what we see, how fast we see it, and who gets prioritized, all based on, at best, who pays them more. You think the internet is shitty now?

It's a false dichotomy anyway, framing anyone concerned with net neutrality as a panic-driven alarmist, and anyone opposed to net neutrality rules as calm, rational, and intelligent. It's rhetoric designed to discredit one side without addressing its actual arguments.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

I feel like that's more of an inevitable entropy kind of thing.

[–] catty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

until trump's bitcoin setup is going to allow all of them to receive funds under the table.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

That is 9 months of median Texas salary btw

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I haven't seen any of the predictions come true. Anyone else? I'm honestly a bit shocked. Anyone want to show us how the death of net neutrality hurt the internet?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Nothing really changed because the rules havent been set in stone. It was reinstated in 2024 and then struck down by the courts with the new administration. Plus, California and other states have their own net neturalality which puts pressure for the rest of the states to continue to abide.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Tbh it was never going to have as big of an effect as many made it out to. Net neutrality is very much a good thing since not enforcing it just fuels monopolies, but many places don't have strict net neutrality rules and the internet is still alive there.

Though, a big thing preventing this are anti monopoly laws - companies won't pay to restrict access to competition because all it would do is get them broken up. So the worst that happens is sometimes preferential treatment when it comes to data limits.

[–] LodeMike 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of ISPs block certain incoming ports.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Or all of them, thanks to CGNAT.

[–] LodeMike 5 points 21 hours ago

Some block outgoing ports too.