this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1553 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

9085 readers
3062 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KingCake_Baby@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What everyone forgets is that the actual voting already happened. The bus company, Cliff driving Committee, voted before the bus embarked. They voted for the bus driver to drive off the cliff to cut spending to maintenance and health insurance to the driver and bus. There only so much the riders can say at that point

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only option the riders have to not drive off the cliff is to take control of the bus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (10 children)

But if we vote for the non-vegan ice cream place, we're telling the leadership that we're okay with non-vegan options and no progress will ever be made!

/s for the illiterate

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trying to reach the "I don't do politics" crowd with "harm reduction" doesn't really work as a strategy.

Like, they're already admitting that when something is an unappealing and controversial, they'd rather check out than engage. Going on to explain the gritty strategy for approaching unappealing and controversial politics is just adding more reasons onto the "I don't do politics" pile.

It's a crass comparison, but it would be like if someone said "I don't play MOBAs" and the response was to immediately launch into an explanation of League's current meta-strategy. Don't be surprised when they immediately check out of the conversation. (Yes I know games are frivolous and politics is life and death -- but the people who "don't do politics" don't see it that way)

More than that, nearly all of the "I don't do politics" people are almost certainly never going to see this image. We're in an online forum dedicated to talking about politics. The only people who see this are the people who already choose to spend their personal time on the subject. So ask yourself, is this image really about the people who are checked out of politics? Because, practically (regardless of intent) all this really seems to be is a thought-terminating cliche to throw at anyone who points out that running a "We're the lesser evil candidate!" doesn't actually engage or activate anyone who's already checked out!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

20 people voted to drive over the cliff. 30 people voted to fucking gun it and send that shit straight into the abyss. 1 person voted for ice cream but the cliff voters beat him to death. 50 people didn’t vote

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (7 children)

The problem with this is that the choice isn't cliff or ice cream. The choice is the cliff in front of us or the cliff around the corner.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The "drive off the cliff" party vs the "drive off the cliff, but ever so slightly slower and also we'll wave some rainbow flags I guess" party. I know who I'm voting for!

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Also, I'm installing a bigger motor so you have a reason not to vote for the other party, because they'd get to go even faster

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trillnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 month ago

im sure the illogical thinkers will start thinking logically any day now

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Not necessary in actual democracies where you have 10+ different parties.

There, abstaining is just an other party. One with a powerful voice telling the politicians that if enough people not vote, it is a big sign that something is wrong with the system and things will need to change to prevent riots.

It is not the same as voting blank, which is also possible. Then your vote gets added to the most popular vote. In a way of saying that you are content with any.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's BS. Removing yourself just removes yourself, nothing more. 70% of the population not voting just means 16% get to decide - there's no redo.

After all, you not voting because you didn't like the options is indistinguishable from you not voting because you didn't care.

In order to protest you need to participate in the process. Even invalidating your ballot is a stronger sign than not voting.

I live in Switzerland where low voter turnout is common, yet the population prides itself for its direct democracy. This discussion comes up every election cycle and it's always the same. Nothing happens because of low turnout and nobody thinks twice about why.

Here, voting blank is the same as not voting, btw. It's the way to correctly Not Care in cantons that mandate voting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 1 month ago

here it's reversed. blank votes are counted separately, meaning that you want to participate but no option is good. abstaining means you don't care.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›