this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
30 points (94.1% liked)

Hardware

2980 readers
68 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"LG proposes eliminating solder balls"

"By instead using copper, with solder balls on top"

What?

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The article is utter garbage and misunderstands dimensions.

The new strategy allows for pads to be closer together not for the whole thing to be flatter. It allows to shrink sideways, not in height.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My phone is thinner sideways than most, and it's often a problem when browsing websites that make assumptions about screen dimensions.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Again, it's about shrinking chips, not shrinking phones. With smaller chips there is more space for other things like slightly larger batteries. Phone size is not dictated by chip size.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"It allows to shrink sideways" sounded like it was referring to phone dimensions. I must have misunderstood what you were saying.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Don't worry, you aren't the only one, the tomshardware article had the same misunderstanding.

The only thing this change does is that the pads of the chip packages can be spaced tighter together, which allows the packages of the chips to be smaller sideways. It doesn't change the height of the chips.

And yet not only did the original article misunderstand that sideways isn't height, they also thought that making the chip packages narrower will directly lead to the phone getting slimmer.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm finally okay with researching thinner phones, I feel like a modern phone has enough punch compared to just some years ago. Sure, a bigger battery would be nice, or a more effective CPU but it's sincerely okay IMO.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even mid-range smartphones have been "good enough" in the last ~5 years in terms of device performance.

Flagships used to be distinguished by camera quality, but this benefit is not as noticeable as it once was.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah I put a margin there :-) mostly because some years ago you could get good midrange phones but there was a lot of crap around too. I changed my like 5-6 old mid range (good one) for a 2 yo "flagship killer" (so not really a flagship) for the camera (Leika vs cheap crap :-) and well it's scrolling a bit more fluidly... Yeah that's about it.

It has more storage, ram etc, it's close to my daily PC driver...

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Ball torture moved to the shaft.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's see how well they drop test...

[–] a_person@lemdro.id 2 points 1 week ago

Or bend test lol (iphone 15)