this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
405 points (98.3% liked)

News

23367 readers
2642 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A voter-approved Oregon gun control law violates the state constitution, a judge ruled Tuesday, continuing to block it from taking effect and casting fresh doubt over the future of the embattled measure.

The law requires people to undergo a criminal background check and complete a gun safety training course in order to obtain a permit to buy a firearm. It also bans high-capacity magazines.

The plaintiffs in the federal case, which include the Oregon Firearms Federation, have appealed the ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The case could potentially go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 150 points 1 year ago (170 children)

I mean if a common sense law like that violates the state constitution, it does seems like the problem is in the constitution or how it's interpreted, not the law…

load more comments (170 replies)
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Fixed the headline - Judge rules that Americans need more mass shootings before anything changes.

[–] saunjay1@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fixed the headline - Judge rules that Americans need more mass shootings ~~before anything changes.~~

FTFY

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We can’t have reduced gun crimes in America. It would send the wrong message to the rest of the world that we’re reasonable and give a shit about our own people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bitswap@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This will be overturned. This judge is known for making politically motivated decisions. There is a reason this was filed specifically in Harney County where this yahoo presides.

Guaranteed this is not the last time this will be in the news.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope so, will keep an eye on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Femcowboy@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democracy is when the majority of people vote for a law but because rich people from 100+ years ago say otherwise it doesn't get enacted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hpca01@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago

States rights people really confused prolly.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (55 children)

C'mon, this is easy... all you need is a large gathering of BLM people or antifa packing ARs and boom - this law will mysteriously pass before the media frenzy has had a chance to get it's shoes on.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Breaking: one unelected person with an agenda overrules entire state, imposes his personal interpretation of the law

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People from around the developed world looking at America...shaking my head...

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Trust me, Americans who understand what's going on are shaking their heads too. And furiously voting and getting ready to vote. But are there enough of them?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

And the 21st amendment to the U.S. constitution violated the 18th amendment U.S. constitution. They should have passed this as a state constitutional amendment. Note that the judge didn't say in violated the U.S. constitution, just the state - and another one said that it didn't violate the 2nd amendment.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

For reference, the bit in the Oregon state constitution is as follows:

Section 27. Right to bear arms; military subordinate to civil power. The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence [sic] of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power[.]

Pretty similar to the US constitution's second amendment. If SCOTUS was consistent, I think they'd rule in parallel to what's been established elsewhere for licensing, purchasing restrictions, etc.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is much more clear than the 2nd Amendment. That mentions the right to bear arms for self defense. The 2nd Amendment mentions the right to bear arms to defend the state.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

So just pass it as a constitutional amendment

load more comments
view more: next ›