this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025

108 points (100.0% liked)

environment@sh.itjust.works

631 readers

1 users here now

Environment:

The totality of the natural world, often excluding humans.

A subset of the natural world; an ecosystem.

The combination of external physical conditions that affect and influence the growth, development, behavior, and survival of organisms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

d33pblu3g3n3@sh.itjust.works

108

Florida attorney general orders airports to report 'weather modification' activities (thehill.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works to c/environment@sh.itjust.works

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Dear people of Florida,

Please, please, please use this to force airports to report on their impacts on climate change.

Sincerely,

- everyone else

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Does this apply to commuter vehicles?

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I think i finally get it. This is how they're explaining the effects of climate change. They can deny the science all they want but they can't deny the results. Since they have to explain the crazy weather patterns, nothing like a ridiculous conspiracy theory to fill the slot.

[–] MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al 8 points 1 week ago

Does this apply to chemtrails?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Call them every time they see a plane with its engines on

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

does this apply to the military scum?

[+] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works -15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dear fucknuts. This is what people mean with chemtrails. Yes, you don't see them. Yes I know what a contrail is.

If anything, fucknuts are geoenginering deniers. "Haha these idiots think they're getting sprayed with chemicals". No, I just don't flat out refuse to believe weather modification has been and still is a very real thing.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What would be the motivation

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To prevent rain on the opening ceremony of the 2008 Olympics in Beijing was an use? Go figure

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So a single use (asserted by you with no supporting evidence) should be enough to convince us that there's a widespread conspiracy to manipulate weather and cause things like hurricanes and the Texas flood? What evidence do you have that these were deliberate and not the natural results of fossil-fuel driven climate change (results that scientists have been warning about for 50 some odd years)?

What would be the reason for the larger scale instances that Republicans are claiming and who is doing it?

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

How do you go from

No, I just don’t flat out refuse to believe weather modification has been and still is a very real thing.

convince us that there’s a widespread conspiracy to manipulate weather and cause things like hurricanes and the Texas flood?

By lumping weather modification (as another user posted, like silver nitrate) together with what you claim I meant (which I don't, that's ridiculous) you keep the discussion stigmatized. The fact that some known experiments don't seem harmful at the first glance doesn't mean other, harmful, chemicals aren't used. We don't know because there is any department or agency that oversees such things. That's what it's all about. There should be full transparency about these things.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They dumped silver nitrate on the clouds the day before so that would become heavy and rain.

This technology is widely known and was developed in the 1980s.

Its nothing to do with the water droplets trails that planes leave behind.

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Rereading my comment, I get the responses now. With the "No," I meant to affirm that I know what contrails are and I know ie. silver nitrate being sprayed from a plane wouldn't seem visible like an contrail.

I should've phrased it better.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If we could manipulate the weather, it wouldn't be getting worse by the year, fucknut.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

We can seed clouds to make them rain sooner. Some countries use this regularly. That’s the kernel of truth the conspiracy nuts build their conspiracy around.

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You refuse to acknowledge geoengineering?

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I refuse to acknowledge the ludicrous idea that humans are capable of intentionally and predictably controlling the weather. And I call out your blatantly dishonest attempt to twist the meaning of the word "geoengineering" in an attempt to make it appear that I said something I didn't. You're not just a fucknut, you're also a liar.