this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
173 points (98.9% liked)

xkcd

12149 readers
278 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

xkcd #3116: Echo Chamber

Title text:

This is almost as bad as the time I signed up for a purely partisan fishing expedition.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3116/

explainxkcd for #3116

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheImpressiveX 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This is almost as bad as the time I signed up for a purely partisan fishing expedition.

[–] LodeMike 13 points 12 hours ago

I really appreciate how the speech bubble is just transparency.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 16 points 14 hours ago

I just wanna shout out the choice to make the "bubble" transparent so it matches every background. That's some quality meme-ing.

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 31 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

I saw a really interesting Ted Talk from a Google engineer waaaaaaay back in or before 2012 (I think), discussing the emerging danger of algorithms isolating people in echo chambers.

Apparently the problem we've got right now is not that people can't foresee these problems, but rather that those in charge, for whatever reason, are completely ignoring the warnings from their own engineers.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

We seem to be finding our way into echo chambers just fine without algorithms or big tech as well.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 hours ago

There's a Kurzgesagt video that talks about how it's not so much that the internet is forming echo chambers as it is encouraging arguments. People aren't just finding others that they agree with, they're attacking people they don't.

Finding people who agree with you isn't necessarily a bad thing. Attacking everyone who don't because you now know a bunch of people have your back is the dangerous part. Algorithms play this up because it drives engagement. Two tribes arguing keeps people coming back for more, so it ends up being all you see online.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

for whatever reason

Money. It's for money.

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Eh... everyone has different reasons, and I'm sure there's a healthy diversity of types involved in this shit.

[–] W_itjust_works@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

0 - 1

Did... you downvote yourself?

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ive done it before by mistake tbf

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 10 points 14 hours ago

I've done it for money

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

That can't possibly be right, because it didn't appear in my YouTube recommendations.

/S

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

There really is an xkcd for everything.