this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
874 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2540 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 211 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I get the sentiment, but MAGA being furious at anything doesn’t mean much. They only have that one state.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 49 points 11 months ago

The magnitude of their anger never changes, but it does change direction.

[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

Haven't they hated him for months or years now anyway?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.world 172 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Yeah they also get furious at books and healthcare.

[–] jayrhacker@kbin.social 82 points 11 months ago

"Your Boos Mean Nothing, I've Seen What Makes You Cheer"

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 68 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 70 points 11 months ago (4 children)

They’re also mad at Froot Loops right now.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 33 points 11 months ago (8 children)

That’s a new one.

Oh it really is a new one.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/boycott-looms-for-kellogg-s-froot-loops-for-pushing-woke-agenda-on-kids/ar-AA1kw2QO

Many former fans are toying with the idea of a boycott since word started circulating on social media about Kellogg's Froot Loops promoting a digital library "with equity, diversity and inclusion content" advertised on boxes of the cereal in Canada.

The digital library website, co-sponsored by Boys and Girls Clubs of Canada, allows limited access to all users who confirm they are at least 13 years old, and additional access with a code found inside the specially marked boxes of Froot Loops.

Thank you, Canada, aggravate away. Gonna go buy some to support the cause and see if I can get some repubs I know on the mailing list or something.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was wondering why my neighbor was out in his front yard burning boxes of breakfast cereal. His wife was pissed too, she was carrying the AR-15.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s a hell of a time when you can’t be certain if this insane collection of words is sincere or not. All of it. It could go either way.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Literally can't tell if he's joking or not. Crazy times we live in.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Really? Why? Did they just now realize that's not how "fruit" is actually spelled?

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think it has something to do with making a online childrens library?

[–] giantfloppycock@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you were worried about gay indoctrination then why did you feed your kids the rainbow cereal before?

They get really frustrated over this because they can’t call you gay as a retort

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And Republicans being against diversity, equity, and inclusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yamainwitch@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

When they went after the OG neighbor Fred Rogers, they showed us who they fucking were, FUCK the GOP

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And cartoons and movies. At this point aimless fury seems to be their default state.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 100 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So there are time when MAGA is NOT furious?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Sure. When a cop murders an unarmed black person. In the immediate aftermath of a school shooting. Any time a lgbtqia+ person commits suicide. Imagining an 11 year old being forced to carry a rapist's offspring to term. Burning books. Any time they see a confederate flag. Most time spent watching Jeff Dunham.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

MAGA usually seem pretty happy when they are limiting or taking away the rights of women, people of color, or people that love someone besides the their opposite sex. Another time they are happy is when they are instilling their christian religious beliefs in law while at the same time repressing non-christian beliefs.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 92 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

In Mitt Romney's defence, if I had to choose between four more years of Joe Biden and Donald Trump potentially forming the Fourth Reich, I'd choose Sleepy Joe any day of the week.

I don't like Biden but he needs our energy. The opposition is so much worse.

Almost like Romney is one of the few Republicans with some actual fucking integrity.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's only a Reich if it's from Germany. Otherwise it's just sparkling dictatorship.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

It's kind of funny how McCain and Romney were/are the voice of reason in the GOP. We didn't know how good we had it. Or rather how much worse it could get.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

We took for granted basic decency and respect, and didn't think Republicans would just toss them out completely.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Romney is no saint. Just because he is being pragmatic now doesn't make me trust him.

I can say the same for Joe Biden though. I don't like his history or his politics but a vote not for him is a vote for Trump next November.

I hate this fucking reality.

[–] jayrodtheoldbod@midwest.social 60 points 11 months ago (11 children)

This election is going to be one of the worst ones and that's saying something.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Guess it’s good he’s not running for office now or re-election later, so he can openly not give one rat’s ass about it.

[–] sarcasticsunrise@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

Amongst the GOP, "many such cases"

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

MAGA furious in much the same way my 1 year old neice was furious that I wouldn't let her drink paint last weekend.

[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

Quoting them directly, "Fuck your feelings."

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 31 points 11 months ago

They transformed him into a RINO lol

[–] proper@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

they always say stuff like this once they’re out, since they aren’t playing the game of willfully obtuse anymore.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sounds like some people need to learn to lift themselves up by their own MAGAstraps

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

(To the tune of 'The Eensy Weensy Spider')

The melty little snowflakes went off the rails again,

"Why won't fuckin' Romney stay on the Trumpie Train?"

A zombie'd surely starve there, tryin' to find a brain,

As the melty little snowflakes go off the rails again.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 14 points 11 months ago (5 children)

"Anybody. I would be happy to support virtually any one of the Republicans, maybe not Vivek [Ramaswamy], but the others that are running would be acceptable to me. I would be happy to vote for them. I would be happy to vote for any of the Democrats too. I mean it would be an upgrade from, in my opinion, Donald Trump and perhaps also from Joe Biden," Romney said.

The senator added: "I like President Biden. I find him a very charming and engaging person, there's some places I agree with and most places I disagree with him. I think he made all sorts of terrible mistakes, but I would like to see someone else run."

Smart man. If I were a Republican, I’d probably say the same. He seems to see things right down the line. It’s a shame he didn’t manage to make it to become the 45th president; echoing his sentiment it, would have been a far greater alternative.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

He's an actual traditional conservative, which isn't a republican anymore. But he has the freedom to say this because he's on his way out. If he was in the first half of his career, there's no way he'd be so up front.

That said, as someone who voted against him, it has been refreshing hearing him vocally go against Maga for years. But he has had the luxury because his seat in as head political Mormon in Mormon controlled State, and his status in the party as a former presidential nominee. He was never risking much besides being a target of MAGA domestic terrorism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Senator Mitt Romney faced backlash online Saturday from supporters of Donald Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement after a resurfaced interview showed him saying he'd vote for Democrats in the 2024 presidential election.

Romney, a Utah Republican who has served in the Senate since 2019, announced in September he won't seek reelection in 2024, citing age as a contributing factor.

In late October, Trump denounced Romney as "a total loser" who allegedly "begged" to be appointed secretary of state in 2016.

However, Romney has since continued to become a prominent Trump critic and was the lone Republican senator who voted in 2020 to convict the former president after he was impeached for pressuring Ukraine to open an investigation into the Biden family.

The book features several moments of harsh Trump criticism from the Utah senator, including his description of the former president as "really not smart."

In previous response to a request for comment, Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung told Newsweek that Romney is "a certified loser who announced his retirement after everyone learned he was serving himself instead of his constituents.


The original article contains 731 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What are you gonna do MAGA? Kill him?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›