this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
359 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73705 readers
3659 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm already boycotting rockstar, just make offline games and stop with the invasive bs

Now my money is going to indie developers

[–] FlembleFabber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(almost) every game is an offline game if you pirate it ;)

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] schizolol9@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im bout to crash out this is absolutely the most stupidest idea ever. Anyone should be able to play this game regardless of age.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If the game isn't rated AO it shouldn't have an age verification.

R rating is fucking 17+ not 18+. R rating is still for minors.

If your game needs an age rating then you shouldn't be allowed to have an R rating straight to AO for you.

Oh what's that visa won't let you sell your AO rated game?

Too fucking bad.

Maybe find a better solution then. ):<

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

With the reputation most companies have with leaking and breached data, who wouldn't want to have their ssn and license on file with rock star games?!

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it even hard ro find someone's SSN anymore?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Not really, the assholes used the last four of it for college emails in the 2000s FFS.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't mind not having to play with children. But it's a privacy issue

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

What about disabling the shitty anti-cheat or even just enabling it on Linux so I, as a 27yo, can play the damn game?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

guess ill be pirating the next one, since there will be no online mode.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Same exact thought.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 148 points 3 days ago (17 children)

GTA online is the worst thing to happen to the series, since it killed off story DLCs. Which were a fantastic way to get new story based content for their games between the years long wait between sequels. Damn those gamers and their obsession with buying microtransactions.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Then they double killed it when they started introducing nonsense like flying cars with rocket launchers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)

If they roll this out to my country, I'm just not buying any of their games. My privacy is worth a lot more than that.

I might still play them, I just won't buy them, because I'm not doing age verification.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The same parents that allow their children to play these games now will allow them to play then.

This will just make me not want to play these games.

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 38 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Isn't GTAV an 18 rated game? So children shouldn't be able to buy it in the first place.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's M rated. M ratings are 17+ the ESRB rating for 18+ is AO.

M ratings are for minors, AO is for adults.

You need to ID to buy an AO game, you do not for M unless it's a individual store policy.

Due to anti porn sentiment and stores refusing to carry porn. Only 24 games have ever gotten the AO rating

It's considered a death flag.

It's much like how the Deadpool movie was R rated instead of pg13. This was considered a huge risk cause R rates movies don't make money was the common theory.

But even then R rating is also for minors. Movies have the NC-17 rating which is for 18+ and thus only adults. This would be the AO rating in games.

Stores and public facing businesses are so piss scared of having adult rated content even if it's not porn, just because of the vague idea that adult only content HAS to be porn cause "what else would it be"

That rating systems have undermined their very purpose and become fucking useless. It's why everything is only M rated instead of being AO when it really should be.

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

It's not really relevant as the UK rating system doesn't have M or AO clarifications. The game is rated 18 so it's for adults only.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 days ago

The point is to make children used to checks.

It's a didactic law.

IRL usually children grow up feeling they are free (except for their parents) to an extent.

This is intended so that identifying yourself in the Internet were normal by the time you grow up for it to matter.

But, of course, there might be some good considerations, if you're into playing devil's advocate. People might remember which stupid shit they were posting when they were younger, and want for future generations to be always conscious of the difference between pseudonymity and anonymity, and superficial anonymity vs real. People might want to make it so that nobody had a false sense of security, leading to really bad mistakes. People might want this to be the step preceding some way to fight bots.

And they might even not have good considerations, but eventually realize that the oppressive system they are building is best rebuilt for something better and used differently. Wouldn't be the first time in history.

It's just that laying down your arms in hopes for that is unwise.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 120 points 3 days ago (5 children)

They would lose likely 98% of their player base.

maybe the goal is instead to try to get ahead of regulation by implementing a system that is easily bypassed by most kids (like these video based age estimations). Then they can show this to the regulator and be like: "look were already doing everything we can, no need to actually put the regulation in place".

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seriously. Our school had a presentation by a guy about kids and computer usage. The gist of it was: Roblox bad, because of paedophiles. GTA good, because it furthers role playing. Basically the opposite of the age recommendations.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Welll...Depends on if you install mods I guess?

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 26 points 3 days ago

Maybe that actually makes it playable. But who am I kidding?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The thing with age verification is that I don't think it's a bad thing if done securely, but still it still makes me sad, because Internet will never be the same with it. In the end it will be only few big websites who can afford to care about Internet regulation.

Well, after all maybe it's time to switch to Gemini protocol, they are not going to regulate that!

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Parents will just have their kids play on their accounts. This only hurts the average person who now needs to worry about who has that information and how it's secured.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

If that's true its going to be funny when the account gets banned because of something kiddo did

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

age verification is just a BS strawman. do you remember when we where young? we would access stuff and find ways to buy stuff. but whenever there was a reasonable but fair gap, it would be much harder to get whatever we wanted: buying weed was so much easier, than buying alcohol (without the appropriate age).

pirating is easy (even i figured it out before having enough money to buy movies & games). so the kids will just pirate that stuff and get their way anyway. age verification at the store makes so much more sense. sure, there are ways to circumvent those. but it is a reasonable stop block.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

When I couldnt buy digital stuff because of age restrictions (e.g. game shops) I at one point figured out that Steam doesnt do that and you could get Paysafecards to buy them this way.
No need for paypal (which needs an online banking enabled SEPA account or credit card) or a credit card.

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 1 points 23 hours ago

exactly what i am talking about. age restriction at the physical store kept you away for a while, while not forcing an alternative/underground market. however, if you knew the only way to get it is on an alternative store - you would immediately have looked there.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

and i plan to pirate GTA

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Maybe I'm dating myself but this is the same company that released state of emergency for the PS2? That game you could literally mow down people in a mall with a mini gun?

They were worried about "the children?" News to me.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My mum enjoyed the bonus level in the mall where you could just kill like 100 people as fast as you could.

Her favourite weapon is the flamethrower.

Her first reaction to the game was "that's disgusting", but I let her have a go and suddenly she was toasting a whole crowd and loving every minute of it.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

That's disgusting!

Where can I find more!

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago

They have way more investors to jerk off and please now

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Can you even call it GTA online if there aren't a dozen 12 year olds running around screaming, "N***** and F*****".

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Can you call it that when chat is disabled anyway ; D

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So, I loose no functionality when I pirate it?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Wrong. You "lose" the age verification feature.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

If we're going to government age verification everywhere just get rid of fucking ESRB and content ratings

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or just start fucking using the AO rating.

GTA should have a fucking AO rating but because of money no game gets more then an M rating making the entire system pointless.

Exactly. What's the point of AO is all major retailers pledged 20 years ago that they won't sell it? AO is basically a sales ban

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›