This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
Source: Pew Research
I think one of the scariest parts here is how only one news source cracked 50% for Republicans. That indicates a rejection of the concept of news
I’ve said for a while now that I’d love to see the demographics for Ground News users. Because I can almost guarantee that the vast majority are left-leaning. Because right-leaning people have zero interest in comparing news stories or getting different takes. They just want a single narrative, with their opinions for the week piped directly into their brain.
Exactly the takeaway. They do not value different sources corroborating a set of facts. They prefer a specific narrative. Which has been the feeling we've all had for years as it relates to Republicans. It's very interesting to see it in data.
I think it's more that they reject information / knowledge / learning. That's why they're so prone to disinformation, grift, and conspiracy theories.
They accuse all of the other sources of media of being leftist. They reject any narrative that puts their ideology in a bad light. Their politicians have been pushing them away from news sources that they deem "leftist". They've been entirely brainwashed by centralized messaging from a handful of sources yet accuse the left of being the brainwashed ones. It's wild.
I also reject the concept of any for-profit 24 hour news station. There isn't that much news and they need to hype up nonsense to keep attention and get advertising dollars.
Trust is a strong word for almost all of these. A lot of them have betrayed my trust before so I don't trust them anymore. Like who would trust the New York Times? Honestly? They do some good reporting. But I think you'd have to be naive to just trust whatever they say these days, or ever really.
Yeah they lost me when in 2004 they buried a story about all the WMD experts leaving Iraq on the back pages of section A while vocally supporting the war on the front page.
Exactly. I may use some of these as sources if several all agree, but trust? Nah.
Interesting that The New York Post is more or less equally distrusted by the two. Kinda surprising, given that it's trash. I'd think repubs would be more in favor.
This was my main takeaway too. I would have figured it would be right up there with Fox. If not democrats and not republicans, who even is their audience?
NYPost is tabloid clickbait. Opportunists. Perhaps the Republican base is aware?
I'm probably wrong. These people are so unpredictable and easily influenced by cult leadership.
No, it is because it has New York in its name (bad). I suggest they change the name to FLPost after Florida or TXPost for Texas (good).
Lol fair enough
Like, I get trusting Fox News makes no sense given their track record, and a bunch of those are just blatantly untrustworthy...
But if you trust The Joe Rogan Experience as a News sources, you're a moron of the highest degree. It doesn't even set itself up as that. Joe Rogan himself regularly refers to himself as an idiot and you shouldn't follow what he says, he's just giving an opinion. The opinion of someone with no expertise. Whose claim to fame is as a comedian and such high-brow commentary as UFC fights and making white Americans eat bugs and bumble about in the dark.
I answered distrust on every single one of these.
Could we do some research into the amount of lies on each source?
I will hear out Associated and BBC but if it's in the US? Nah, probably owned by some billionaire parasite shitbag.
Wow! Looks like one could say that Dems generally trust "mainstream" media and Reps generally don't.
Doesn't Fox News being "The Number One Cable News Network" make it mainstream? I know my mother shutdown when I asked her.
The trust in Fox News is SO disheartening. It's almost completely sensationalist propaganda.
I'm surprised NPR has low trust rates from both parties. I can feel a liberal bias, their long-form stories are excellent, but they do try to present both sides which probably makes some liberals unhappy.
National Propaganda Radio is as bad as Fox News. They push whatever agenda the war machine demands.
NPR is tied for the highest trust/distrust ratio on the dem side, tied with AP.
but they do try to present both sides which probably makes some liberals unhappy.
I’ll tell you why they lost me. In the run-up to the Iraq War II, the GeeDubz administration was obviously pushing bullshit. Like - everyone who wasn’t already subsumed into the Fox News talk radio hivemind knew - with very very little-to-no doubt, they were lying about WMDs. Outright lying - not “wrong” - outright lying.
They had a secret meeting to plan this war before Sept 11, and now they were hell bent to do it. But, because this was pre-trump, they needed to at least snow everybody under enough to make it look “legitimate”.
NPR ran every bullshit lie straight up as if it were true - and, listen, everybody knew; everybody from the CIA down to Joe from Joe’s Bar and Grill knew - it was absolute garbage BS. But there they were promoting the lies just like Fox News, only with a little twist - a little “critics say” coda at the end, a totally useless nod.
GeeDubz wasn’t doing press conferences then. Like at all. For a year, I think. Anyway, he’s finally going to do one. Several major networks are going to be allowed one question each. NPR is one of them. The day arrives, we all listen in to see what flimsy crooked tacked-on part of their insane plan they’ll work to expose. The question comes.
It was the most mealy, softball, worthless question imaginable. NPR had sent Juan Williams to ask it. I think he’s still lying for Fox News where he went several years later.
That, and NPR outright refusing to call “enhanced interrogation” what it was; that’s when I told them to GTFO. Never went back.
Listen, they’re as liberal as a chain store. Their whole purpose is to deflect progressive narratives. And that’s all they do.
Fox News admitted under oath in a court of law that they intentionally mislead their audiences with bullshit in order to push an agenda.
After that happened, Fox News should've been either forced to shut down or their audiences should've walked away in shame.
Instead, Fox News audience: WE WANT MORE OF THAT!
I think they should have just been told they cannot use the term news. They could use the term Knews if they like. Like Krab for News
If the just went with Fox Entertainment, that's fine as well. But if the information you are putting out there you are saying your viewers know isn't necessarily factual, it shouldn't fall under news. The Onion Im sure would be fine with BREAKING KNEWS
I mean the answer is really obvious. Fox and right-wing news outlets in general are designed to elicit strong emotional responses with the stories that they run and how they run them. It is, without exaggeration, literally - in the classical sense of the term “literally” (fuck I hate that I have to specify that now) - the daily hour(s) of hate. Strong emotions elicit the release of dopamine. This is why it “feels good” to many people.
I took the results a bit differently.
First, I ignored the dislike slices. Who's watching sources they distrust? Nobody, so that's personal bias, IMO.
Now, look at the Trust slices. Other than FoxNews, no news source really breaks 25% for the Repubs. They just don't seem to follow any source. If they did, they'd trust someone. So half watch FoxNews, and only a quarter watch anything else.
For the lefties, half the sources have 30-60% trust. That is a lot more sources getting regular eyes and ears on them. Something like NPR getting less high reviews is likely just less listeners as it's a bit "drier" news and a bit "both sidesey" due to it being public media. The dislike for it is only 3%, tied for the lowest dislike. Counterpoint is Newsmax for the left. Really low like and dislike because why would a liberal ever watch that?
Joe Rogan Experience being called a news source 😠
Do they even have news? I thought it was like the Howard Stern show or something
It IS.
The most striking thing in this graphic is that Republicans don't trust anything except Fox and Joe Rogan. Shows the lack of critical thinking imho.
I'm really surprised they omitted OAN, the news source for America's most critical thinking challenged.
Even Rogan didn't hit a third. That's nute
So Republicans distrust media overall much more than Democrats.
If it wasn't for the Fox News and Joe Rogan trust, i would say Republicans seem more media literate than Democrats. Although in these case the Republicans also distrust them relatively more than the Democrats do for some of "their" media. In particular the NYT and CNN deserve much more distrust imo. It is clear that they are agenda driven, usually against the interests of the middle class.
I think it's less about having an agenda or not, and more about the factuality of reporting. If I read "so-and-so is quoted as saying..." then can I trust that what is being represented is the same as what the speaker intended?
Agenda-free reporting would be nice in theory, but I don't think it's very realistic. We can demand certain standards of factuality though, and then just do the legwork to identify and take biases into account.
I mean, they are nowhere near Rogan or Fox News in terms of agenda, but i think Rogan is a great example. Most of his stuff is just podcasts. So instead of "quoting" the guests, he just lets them speak directly. But the choice of guests, the choice of question and so on, make a huge difference in the picture conveyed to the consumer.
One could argue that the relatively subtle way of media like the NYT is more insidious as it is harder to spot, but it seems that the "blunt" approach of Fox News isn't less effective, so i couldn't judge which is better or worse.
I agree with you that it isn't very realistic to find reporting free of any Agenda, even if the reporters do their best to be as neutral as possible.
How the fuck does Fox news have 19% trust rate among the Dems?
The New York Post being a single point of agreement is great.
Dems hate it cause they know it's a shitty right wing tabloid. Reps hate it because they don't read / don't know what it is, but it's from New York so it must be liberal.
Democrats: There definitely are some news sources you could at least compare to each other if not trust.
Republicans: Fox news and Joe Rogan all the way folks. Nothing else to see here.
Edit: There is an App called Ground News. It tries to outline which topics get reported by which outlets and where the left and right have their blind spots.