this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
13 points (78.3% liked)

Android

31485 readers
4 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm a fan of acrescent but something about nearly $6000 in monthly costs doesn't smell right.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They need $5800/month in recurring donations to fund a full time developer to be working on Accrescent, implementing new features, creating new tooling, etc. The blog post clearly says this.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah thanks I can read. It is not clear at all.

An example is that it says "to fund full-time development", and you've assumed thats a "full-time developer."

What are we talking here - is it a salary for someone? Overheads? Marketing? Hosting etc? What will donations give us? Is there a roadmap? If anything, the store needs more apps. A slick new frontend is pretty far down my list of wants.

And before you come back with another spikey comment remember that I'm saying this as a fan of Acrescent. I'm not suggesting there's anything nefarious going on. If they are were asking VC's for cash this is the information they'd be expected to provide.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  1. Develop a privacy-friendly app store.
  2. Only accept donations through Microsoft.
  3. wHy IsNt AnYoNe dOnAtInG?
  4. Fail.
[–] three@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Our income comes from two primary sources: 1) recurring and one-time GitHub Sponsors donations and 2) cryptocurrency donations.

https://accrescent.app/donate

  1. Don't read the article
  2. Be completely wrong
  3. Look like an ass when someone calls you out
[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did read the article. Crypto is just not even worth mentioning.

[–] three@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your whole point is that a privacy focused app store should provide privacy focused donation methods.... which crypto is....

[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its also rife with scams and incredibly volatile.

[–] three@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but again to your point, it's a privacy friendly way to donate.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There are lots of other private ways to donate that don't involve scams.

[–] Eggroley@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So because crypto has been used for scams, no one should use it or support someone who accepts it?

Wait till you hear about fiat.

Crypto is only rife with scum because of its privacy. And I don't disapprove of private alternatives just because bad people use them.

That's government speak. 1:1

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

So because crypto has been used for scams, no one should use it or support someone who accepts it?

No because it's used almost exclusively in scams. Also because of the insane environmental impact.

Wait till you hear about fiat.

I'll say the same thing about platforms like Zelle or wire transfers. If someone asks you for them, it's almost certainly a scam.

Crypto is only rife with scum because of its privacy.

  • Lack of any regulation whatsoever. And increasingly so with the new US administration.
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What would you use instead? PayPal? Which was literally founded by fascist Elon Musk and democracy-hating Peter Thiel?

Anything that involves banks? Literally centralized financial institution that are subject to extensive KYC/AML regulation?

GitHub Sponsors at least doesn't charge fees, so it's the best of these options. But crypto, especially XMR, is objectively better for accepting donations online.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

What would you use instead?

LiberaPay? Kofi? Givebutter?

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Looks like they accept monero and bitcoin among other crypto, did they not have that before?

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This looks like an ad. What's wrong with F-droid?

[–] wasu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Nothing wrong with it. It is just an alternative, for those who are more concerned about privacy and security than an average user.