this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
437 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

74019 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago

Sounds like confirmarion bias.
I'd like to know the industry sector they are working in.
I'd say a high amount of them work in Tech and IT.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well that explains a lot about Lemmy's strong dislike for AI with a burning passion.

[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 132 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Only corporate executives benefit from AI.

Everyone else is harmed, both directly and indirectly, and it makes the customer experience far worse because workers are replaced by chatbots that are incapable of understanding.

From what I've seen, the only people that have a positive view of AI are those who see themselves as the master of others. The trans, nonbinary, & disabled people in this study are very unlikely to fit that mold.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sorry cis male here I find AI negatively. This article is bullshit trying to separate us. We should all be appalled by AI.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

You’re probably overthinking this. To me it shows that this technology, which is often advertised as a tool to level the playing field and “democratize” industries is viewed as doing the exact opposite. Those who should benefit the most from it feel threatened and it looks like we’re moving closer to techno feudalism by the day as LLMs are squeezed into everything without thought. Fascists tend to love AI, use AI and advance AI. That makes the technology a natural enemy of many minorities.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The survey concludes that transgender, non-binary and disabled people tend to view AI more negatively than others. Nothing about this statistical result implies that there aren't plenty of people in other groups, like you, who view AI negatively. It makes a claim about statistical trends.

If you read a report on statistical trends and repond "That's bullshit! It doesn't describe me!" it suggests you're missing the point of surveys and statistics. The survey is quite compatible with many non-disabled cis men disliking AI a lot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

"more likely"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 89 points 1 week ago (9 children)

God, the number of people here who don't know what "more likely" means is insane. Just because you aren't trans, enby or disabled doesn't mean the study is bullshit because you hate AI. It means that if you walk up to a random person and ask them about AI, they're more likely to hate it if they exist in one of those groups.

Secondly, studies like this have value because they can clue people into issues that a community is having. If everyone is neutral about a thing, except for disabled people (who hate it), then maybe that means that the thing is having a disproportionately negative impact on disabled people. Studies like this are not unlike saying "hey, there's smoke over there, there might be a fire."

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Roughly 50% of transgender and/or non-binary people are software developers and roughly 50% are furry artists, so it makes sense we would be more wary of AI.

I use arch, btw.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trans nonby software dev who dated a furry artist, my disdain for AI knows no limits.

I use Nobara, btw. (Is Arch good I've never looked into it)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the words of Miyazaki:

Whoever creates this stuff has no idea what pain is whatsoever. I am utterly disgusted. If you really want to make creepy stuff, you can go ahead and do it. I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all. I strongly feel that this is an insult to life itself.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 week ago

It's mathematically an insult to life itself. It changes evolution in human societies to reduce dissent and diversity of thought. And evolution is important in the sense that to stay on one place you have to run very fast.

So it's sort of a tool for regress. Honestly - similar to the Web itself. It was intended as a hypertext system for scientists. For social interaction there were e-mail and e-news.

I'm thinking - I thought always that Sun is a very cool company, but at the same time they are also the ones who've popularized this messy understanding of the future in which, with some commercial adjustments by today's big tech, we still live. And that understanding was highly centralist, sort of a digital empire.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago

Knowledge based fields were historically a “safe space” for queer and disabled people. If you are just super fucking smart and could be a wizard in a programming language, or were a genius physicist, you could get to the point where you were too valuable to fire for being trans or disabled. I may be trans and an unperson in the place I live, but I can do calculus, and there’s no way they can take that away from me.

There’s an attack on knowledge itself going on right now. A desire by the rich to control information. They want to force us into an unreality where skill and knowledge are meaningless. This hurts people who are socially marginalized, because it takes away one of our few paths for economic survival.

It goes with the attacks on DEI. What they want is a tool that can replace the need for talent, so that they can select who gets to have jobs. They want all jobs to be Graeber’s “bullshit jobs” so that skill is meaningless and they can allot them out to the people they think “deserve” them.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago

outliers badly served by advanced averaging machine

Who knew

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 37 points 1 week ago

These findings are consistent with a growing body of research showing how AI systems often misclassifyperpetuate discrimination toward or otherwise harmtrans and disabled people. In particular, identities that defy categorization clash with AI systems that are inherently designed to reduce complexity into rigid categories. In doing so, AI systems simplify identities and can replicate and reinforce bias and discrimination – and people notice.

Makes sense.

These systems exist to sand off the rough edges of real life artifacts and interactions, and these are people who’ve spent their whole lives being treated like an imperfection that just needs to be smoothed out.

Why would you not be wary?

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man between this and the "AI vegan" bullshit article, they really want to get ahead on crushing any thought that AI is bad. At least by easily manipulated groups.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Like the kind of person that thinks vegans and trans = easily manipulated, because they'll never consider the point might be manipulating their own biases against those groups.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it’s also in an effort to other those who are against AI as it’s being done rn

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Opposed people, or today who know what it's like to be oppressed, are more likely to recognize oppression.

AI is going to fuck us all at this rate. It's already begun. People are losing their jobs.

Losing jobs is just the tip of the iceberg, individualized, friendly mass manipulation is where the shit hits the fan in a whole new way

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Trans lady here, appalled by AI! A lot of the middle management I work with are eager for it, and since I work in M365 administration, my boss keeps compelling me to flip the CoPilot switch to “on” for people.

I hate it.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What kinda bullshit narrative is this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's fair, because AI is biased against them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

That's because they're all on lemmy

[–] Tollana1234567 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

AI is the new crypto by the ceos and c-suites, sorry but theres no market for it for a regular customer base, and they admitted its costing them alot more money using AI than actually saving or even profitting from it. its actually no wonder the people who fall for AI /crypto are mostly conservatives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Oppressed people don't like the walled garden information tools made and profited from by the people using them as a scapegoat distraction for their fleecing of society?

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if the correlation is that these groups tend to be more informed.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, it's that AI has a white male bias.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Smart bunch it would seem.

Fuck AI

[–] morto@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's interesting. I feel like a lone voice in my university, trying to explain to people that using LLMs to do research tasks isn't a good idea for several reasons, but I'd never imagine that being disabled would put me into a group more likely to think like that. If I had to guess, I'd suggest that there's possibly a strong network effect being abused in our social environment to make people get into the AI hype, and we, the ones who live less connected to the "standard" social norms, tend to become less vulnerable to it.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It may also be that disabled, transgender and nonbinary people are more aware of:

  1. The use of AI to reduce people's employment opportunities, which are already tough enough for people in these groups.
  2. The tendency of AI to reproduce the prejudices present in its training materials. If everyone's relying on AI then historical prejudices are going to be perpetuated just because LLMs are regurgitation machines.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

ITT: "this study doesn't say anything interesting about ME, it must be bullshit!!"

[–] db2@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I'm none of those things and so-called AI is utter shit.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 6 points 1 week ago

Disabled, vehemently anti-AI enby here. The only thing I'm good at professionally is being a great big brain, so taking knowledge work away from me makes me angry.

load more comments
view more: next ›