176

Texas independence vote is imminent, group's leader says (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 6 months ago by HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Thorndike@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

How about you take everything south of the Mason Dixon line as well...

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] nullPointer@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

3rd time is the charm!

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

Good luck with that. Yes, one of the major ports in the US is there, lots of military, oil and gas, etc. However, leaving the US, particularly with the local gov having a hard-on for dictatorial bullshit, would basically immediately prove a danger to the US as it could threaten security by (a) having all the left-over military assets but also (b) they could theoretically invite Russia or someone to build a base in Texas and the US will be having none of that. Succession almost certainly means war almost immediately.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

Also like you said, all that millitary, oil, and gas

They would be overrun in a day.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 months ago

Don't wait. Fuck off right now!

[-] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Probably gonna go the same way as what happened with Catalonia, if it gets that far.

[-] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

My reaction: when Michael Scott finds out that Toby is back, but the exact opposite.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023

176 points (91.1% liked)

politics

18069 readers

3923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News