121
Overtaking 500 cars on a bicycle! (youtu.be)
submitted 10 months ago by theplanlessman@feddit.uk to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] smeeps@feddit.uk 35 points 10 months ago

Lots of Americans in this thread. This sort of riding is legal and encouraged in the UK and can be done quite safely. Cycling groups put out videos showing these techniques: https://youtu.be/VNr762i9oQU

Obviously it's a fairly seasoned cyclist thing, and more and more cycle infrastructure is being rolled out so people don't have to do this, but I do object to people from North America in this thread applying their laws and cultural norms to another country where this is quite normal

[-] birdpatch@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

It’s wild how often biking is just plain more efficient than driving

[-] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 22 points 10 months ago

What's funny is that it's only that way because of all the people driving rather than cycling. If the people who could get to where they're going without a car (bike/bus/train/whatever) used those alternative forms of transportation, then it would make the roads much clearer for the few people who actually need to drive (trades/emergency vehicles, etc.).

Both the total throughput and average speed of these roads would increase if more people were on bikes and buses. Unfortunately if it were to ever happen I fear people would just see the clearer roads and think, "Hey, the roads are clear now, I should drive again!" and we'd be right back to square one.

[-] birdpatch@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

So what I’m hearing is we need to make the alternatives like bikes and trains and busses more appealing to use for people with better safer cleaner infrastructure

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Man these covid times were absolutely great. I have to drive a lot for work and there was hardly any traffic during the day and in the evening or at night i would ride my skateboard or bike on the otherwise way to busy streets to go places.

[-] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

I really hoped that if nothing else, maybe the lockdowns would at least have taught us how much better it is in so many ways to not have as many cars on the road, but that seems not to be the case. It's certainly not helped by the fact that here in the UK bus services are being slashed left right and centre. And then we have the PM vocally supporting the pro-car movement...

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago

Is there no cycling infrastructure in this city? I mean I support people to cycle in whatever way they can but this seems like a dangerous way to ride.

[-] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 10 points 10 months ago

This was filmed in London, which actually has some of the best cycling infrastructure in the UK (though that's a low bar to pass). It seems, however, that he's taking a route that happens to not have much of that infrastructure on it.

Though as you say, people should be able to cycle however they please, and it is enshrined in UK law that cyclists are not required to use cycling infrastructure. In this case I'd say he's going fast enough that he'd be a danger to the slower cyclists and pedestrians on the cycle paths and multi-use pathways, so riding on the road makes more sense anyway.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 10 months ago

There's definitely some bits of that with a shared pedestrian/cycle path on the left.

While it's perfectly legal to ignore that, I've seen how people drive in this country. I'd fucking use it. I don't really want "But I had right of way" on my headstone, while some van driver gets a £60 fine and a two month ban.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Shared paths require cyclists to stop at every side road, which is bullshit. They have right of way on the road itself so they will obviously use it instead.

Also, pedestrians don't read road signs so they often think you're not allowed to be on the shared path. I've seen cyclists get assaulted for using them and had plenty of people shouting at me for doing what I'm allowed (but not legally required) to do.

They're just a cheap and lazy way to pretend there is cycling infrastructure when there isn't, really.

[-] smeeps@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago

Shared paths are more dangerous to use if you're going at any speed. Motorists aren't looking for cyclists when driving over them into side roads and driveways, and cyclists lose priority at every side road.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Quite so. My city in Australia has excellent shared paths, but the one paralleling one main road is the only one where I have had a close call with a car

On that route I ride on the road so I'm seen and cars can avoid me

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk -2 points 10 months ago

They're probably not looking for you whizzing up the middle of them either.

At the end of the day you're a squishy meat sack and they're in a two ton metal box, albeit in central London, one travelling at about 5 mph. If you feel safer doing that then you do you. I'm just saying I wouldn't.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Feel what you want to feel, but we have data that it's safer on the road than the "pavement" (sidewalks in the UK) and I'd rather go by data than feelings. Feeling safe is not the same as being safe.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 2 points 10 months ago

It's how you're supposed to ride. You get ahead of the traffic at every possible opportunity because it's safer that way.

We don't have legally required bicycle tests but that motorcyclist is doing what they're supposed to as well. While you probably wouldn't want to be changing lanes quite as frequently on your test, you would fail the test if you sat in traffic rather than overtaking it where possible. If the traffic was speeding instead of stationary, you'd fail your test if you stuck to the speed limit regardless. If you leave the examiner behind, it's their job to catch up to you.

They're not cars and they're not supposed to pretend that they are. The road rules are different and they're intended to make bikes of all types less vulnerable to all the cars which might kill them by getting away from them as soon as possible.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
121 points (91.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

8855 readers
230 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ConfidentLonely@lemmy.world
Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world