this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
201 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
3888 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 36 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Sometimes I feel like the internet is reliving in a 30 year span what retail went through over a whole century. General stores and small specialized shops serving a limited number of clients, same as when you could put on a website to sell to the world the birdhouses you made as a hobby. Then came shopping malls and Walmarts and everybody went oh my god this is so cool, everything in one place. The same enthusiasm we felt over Facebook, Google, amazon. And now, seeing how the big players all sell cheap stuff, control the market and kill all competition, we look back at a time when there were more options, more freedom, and choose to use Lemmy instead of Reddit, and buy our coffee at the local roaster rather than Starbucks.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's both very much caused by capitalism so not a big surprise

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Enshittification had been a thing for a very long time.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Enshittification is a direct a Symptom of capitalism so yeah

[–] malcriada_lala@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I was excited to see this article written on the verge but then I read it. Seems like they are only interested in what the fediverse can do now that Threads is getting in and sticking their foot in the door. It's likely they needed Meta as a corporation to validate federation as something with real potential. We need to be highly critical about the entities who just see this as another way to make money off our data

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Vergecast people and @davidpierce@mastodon.social who wrote this piece have been on board with Activity Pub for much longer than Threads has even been a thing.

I do wonder if they know about Lemmy though :)

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago

They did mention Lemmy in the article.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's a ridiculous take, can't believe it has so many upvotes. The Verge has staff on Mastodon for a while now.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The Verge has staff on Mastodon for a while now.

Is this an article for staff of The Verge? Or is it for an audience that might only relate to something if it's connected to something they've heard of?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

I honestly don’t see how this was your takeaway from the article. That’s not at all what they were saying.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

It feels like the fediverse can be the true Web 3.0.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

My main concern with this is I don't know how well activity pub can scale, and we've already seen various interop problems between different types of platforms. And if email is any indication, once activitypub gets popular it will NEVER GO AWAY and all the developers will hate it.

[–] tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Here is an interesting thread about activitypub's scalability https://hachyderm.io/@hrefna/110198847653604631

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah that's pretty much what I'm talking about, though I wish she was more specific

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why do you say email is hated?

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You'd get a better response if you asked a developer who has actually worked with it. But most of it comes down to bad, outdated, nonstandardized tech

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Given ActivityPub is newer, I hope they've made it with less of the issues email has! Email as we know it is like, what, 40 years old at this point?

[–] isles@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

First inter-user messaging was 62 years ago, first email client was 51 years ago, first spam was 45 years ago, first attachments were 31 years ago.

I don't work with it directly, but it seems we've bolted on a lot of "fixes and functionality" onto email, but the underlying protocols haven't changed dramatically.

And now nearly 56.5% of all emails were spam last year. Though I don't think that counts intranet spam I get from my bosses all the time.