this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
410 points (99.0% liked)

World News

39046 readers
2529 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)

why the FUCK is everything a doughnut

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because the average person doesn't know what a torus is anymore

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know what a torus is. But it sure looks flat to me.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not. It's 2 spheres. But when you look at a diaphanous sphere straight on you can see a brighter thing through it. You can see the pink parts only at the edges because there isn't a brighter mass behind it. And the edges cause more of the material to bunch up making it easier to see.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I burst out laughing

[–] intelati@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Turns out a toroid is a common shape

[–] mihor@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Always has been. 🍩

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You're projecting your desires everywhere.

[–] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

because simpsons did it.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 12 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Mesmerising images of the end stages of a distant star's life have been captured by the James Webb space telescope (JWST).

They show an unprecedented level of detail of a doughnut-like structure of glowing gas known as the Ring Nebula.

Some 2,600 light-years from Earth, the nebula was born from a dying star that expelled its outer layers into space.

"We are witnessing the final chapters of a star's life, a preview of the sun's distant future so to speak, and JWST's observations have opened a new window into understanding these awe-inspiring cosmic events.

The so-called "planetary nebulae" is a misnomer that dates back to the 18th century, when the astronomer William Herschel mistook their curved shapes for those of planets.

It formed when a dying star blasted much of its substance into space, producing a variety of patterns and glowing rings and wispy clouds that seem to ripple outwards.


The original article contains 280 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 46%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] KuchiKopi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is the pictures rotated in such a away to make it look like as viewed from a specific location on earth? Or why is not just the straight picture?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They probably rotated it to align with the ICRS.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ah thank you! One of those things that are essentials impossible to Google without prior knowledge.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, what? How probable is a binary star system consisting of White Dwarfes?

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very probable.

Binary systems are very common.

Stars of the size that end their lifecycle as white dwarfs are also very common.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But considering how White Dwarfs are born, both being there without one being blown away/sucked up? Didn't know binary White Dwarfs are even possible.