370
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) appeared to defend the leader of the Proud Boys militia group after the Justice Department (DOJ) announced it is seeking a 33-year sentence for his role in planning the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Enrique Tarrio was found guilty of seditious conspiracy in May, the most serious charge brought against anyone related to the riots. A 33-year sentence is the longest requested and would be the longest handed down in the Capitol riot cases, if accepted by a judge.

“You know who the Justice Department is not seeking 33 years in prison for?” Greene said on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday. “Antifa/BLM violent rioters who burned, looted, destroyed $2 billion in property in George Floyd riots. And Hunter Biden and Joe Biden for taking criminal bribes selling political influence and favors.”

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 70 points 10 months ago

This would be consistent with the acts of treason that she's committed so far.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

Hunter Biden and Joe Biden for taking criminal bribes selling political influence and favors.”

It's like she's never heard of Trump or Kushner.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 23 points 10 months ago

They have no imagination so they substitute with projection. They know what they're doing.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

She's also lying.

[-] ATQ@lemm.ee 30 points 10 months ago
[-] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago

Yep the Republican party is the biggest threat to the United States.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago
[-] snooggums@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

To be fair, when people blatantly do things they also appear to do the things they are doing.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Yes but I don't go into living room and see that my partner is 'apparently' watching TV. I'm not 'apparently' driving down to the corner store for some biscuits.

Although maybe I should start incorporating this into regular use.

[-] 520@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

It might also be to avoid libel lawsuits. Many outlets will use weasel words like 'allegedly' even if the proof is concrete. It's all to avoid liability.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Thats a good point, allegedly.

[-] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

certainly wasn't an apparition.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] d4rknusw1ld@artemis.camp 29 points 10 months ago

Because she’s a racist piece of human garbage.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago

I am so fucking done with reporters continuously bending over backwards to give the absolute worst of our political spectrum the benefit of the doubt and an assumption of good faith.

[-] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago

Vote. That's one of the only things we can do to make a difference.

[-] Rawdogg@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago

America produces the most rage inducing politicians, I don't live there and I'm so tired of the circus, it must be awful to be a reasonable American and have to deal with this shit, I can't believe how much the world has changed for the worse in 20 years.

[-] icedterminal@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

As an American, it's exhausting.

I can't be reasonable with most because hardly anyone critically thinks. Not asking the important who, what, when, where, why and how questions. It's surface level and whatever has the most attention. It's hard to get someone to think for themselves. Not realising they are in fact easily influenced.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago

SHE

IS

A

NAZI

...but also incredibly stupid

[-] fabian@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

those two things seem to have high comorbidity

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 18 points 10 months ago

And Hunter Biden and Joe Biden for taking criminal bribes selling political influence and favors

Remind me who sold presidential pardons for $2 million each?

[-] Isthisreddit@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

The right wing morons don't know that because right wing media never reported it, and they foam spit "fake news"repeatedly when you tell them

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago

To the surprise of no one.

[-] teamevil@unilem.org 15 points 10 months ago

Stupid attention whore Nazis gonna nazi.

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Of course. A garbage can holds garbage.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the summary/transcript so I don't have to click on thehill

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) appeared to defend the leader of the Proud Boys militia group after the Justice Department (DOJ) announced it is seeking a 33-year sentence for his role in planning the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Tarrio and three others were convicted of plotting to halt the count of electoral votes and potentially overturn the results of the 2020 election.

During the trial, prosecutors said Proud Boys saw themselves as “Donald Trump’s army” and significantly contributed to breaches of the Capitol Building throughout the day.

“The defendants understood the stakes, and they embraced their role in bringing about a ‘revolution,’” prosecutors wrote in court filings.

Greene has previously claimed that the Justice Department is “weaponized for political purposes,” in relation to the special counsel prosecution of former President Trump.

The younger Biden has been under investigation for nearly five years by Delaware prosecutors and was accused of tax and firearms crimes.


The original article contains 344 words, the summary contains 152 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
[-] Yewb@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

The supremacists are testing the waters by taking their masks off, believe everything they are saying and go after them to the maximum extend of the law.

[-] MrCrankyBastard@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure what annoys me more - her stupidity, her open hypocrisy (wouldn't care if she was an adulterous harlot if she wasn't part of a party that is regressive and oppressive), or the fact that people value her for a combination of her appearance and deliberate offensiveness. She exhibits every behavior that Aviator wearing redneck truck video makers imagine 'them Antifas' do,being shrill and obnoxious and 'disrespectful', and they're okay with it because they think it somehow 'owns the libs'.

Wasn't able to pull her bullshit when her Fuhrer was indicted in NYC - she needs more FAFO in her life.

[-] gonzo0815@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

A little OT: why is it that you have 435 representatives and we always hear about like five of them for the last couple of years?

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

That's what American politics have become. Be as loud and obnoxious as you possible can while spewing the stupidest and/or most divisive one-liners you can muster and everyone's all over it.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

They are the loudest.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If you stay quiet, nobody notices for years that you've been taking bribes.

See: Clarence Thomas, who rarely speaks up in court.

[-] Stanwich@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

She defends a traitor and a coward because she's a traitor and a coward.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Has she defended that January 6th traitor that's now a fugitive yet?

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
370 points (94.7% liked)

politics

18074 readers
3173 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS