this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
383 points (97.8% liked)

Games

16433 readers
523 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hegar@kbin.social 200 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm sure he did make games worse, but he also covered up for rapists and threatened to kill employees which seems maybe more headline worthy to me.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 35 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The one thing he was at the company to do, was make good games that make good money.

Covering for rapists and threatening to kill employees is bad enough, but I can see a world where that sort of shit is, not forgiven, but swept under the rug.

That world is one where the money flows. It's not a good world, but it's one that's understandable.

But fucking with the games and making shit worse? In a sane world, the Board would take a look at the company and say, no. this guy has to go for all of the above reasons.

That sane world is one where mergers and acquisitions are heavily scrutinized, and Blizzard was not allowed to merge with Activision.

Actual competition in the space means that the CEO has to actually be halfway good at the job, and maybe not a complete psycho. We don't live in a sane world.

[–] adriaan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

He made the games worse, but that doesn't mean he made them less profitable. Those are sadly distinct goals. The CEO does not have an incentive to make good art.

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

You are making the mistake of conflating game quality with profit. He did not lessen the profitability of the games, on the contrary, and that is what the board cares about, not the quality of games.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Quite a few gamers who wouldn't give a shit about those people, but for whom the red mist would descend about some game mechanic or another.

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 124 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Please stop making me look into his dead corporate demon eyes...

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

Seriously, it's like there is another head inside the outside head...

[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 3 points 9 months ago

The thing about Bobby Kotick, it's got lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes. When it comes at you it doesn't seem to be livin'... until he bites you, and those black eyes roll over white.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 68 points 9 months ago
[–] rah@feddit.uk 32 points 9 months ago

This is not news. The man's job was to make profitable games, not good games.

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sociopaths decisions make not only product and markets worse, even to workers and their families and of course consumers.

[–] diffcalculus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But not to his shareholders! Checkmate, atheists!

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah sadly is all about that. But let me tell you something , it’s just a modus operandis to take the money and run away . You know, like politicians. They don’t care the long effects and results.

[–] tok@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

yes but it made him and shareholders very rich.

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 5 points 9 months ago

No shit bro he was the worst.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

HEY HEY PEOPLE

[–] Poopfeast420@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

There were some stories going around, after the Overwatch 2 launch, that Kotick would sometimes interfere with the development on that game, which would cause them to just lose or waste tons of work. There's more that went wrong with that game, but if those stories are true, that certainly didn't help.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Well blow me down.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago
[–] alucard@sopuli.xyz -5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

This fucking guy is going to work a bungie. I love destiny… a lot. While the game might not be everyone’s brand of tequila, I love it. Super scary times for the studio.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Destiny has been destroyed by Bungie long before him ngl

[–] jgkawell@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You'll be glad to learn that rumor was actually just a joke. It came from a joke TWiD post that went the rounds on Reddit and YouTube but isn't real. Don't worry, Kotick isn't joining Bungie.

[–] alucard@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

That TWAB was unusually funny! Glad to hear it was a joke

[–] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wonder why they thought it was a good idea to post the joke TWAB...

[–] jgkawell@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Bungie didn't do it. It was a community member just having laugh.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I swear I saw it on their website, but I guess I was just fooled. I heard it was a joke TWAB but it felt too close to reality

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago

Bungie aren't hiring him. They are more than capable of messing things up all on their own.

[–] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

That worried me. Looks to not be true though.