this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
211 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
281 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 153 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

"develop a technological standard that might turn a user’s electronic device into the proof of age necessary to access restricted online content."

Can we not? Can parents just take care of their kids like they have for thousands of years instead of futility trying to babyproof the internet for a minority of people? Jesus.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

Especially since parenting is the only thing that's going to actually work. Do you think kids won't figure out a VPN? If they heard enough to type "pornhub", they'll hear about the one extra step.

And there are worse things on the Internet than porn. Some likely on Roblox.

You're just going to have to parent your kid with or without this nanny state blocking scheme.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's like mandating all cars need to have an ignition interlock because some people drive drunk.

[–] pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

or a real example that most newer cars have a "check rear seat for occupant" alert because some people forget their babies in the backseat and they die...

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

The difference is that the people involved there are adults and there is no equivalent to the parent responsible for their behaviour so a technical solution makes more sense there.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

That was the opinion of the Supreme Court nearly 20 years ago in Ashcroft vs. ACLU, but here we are.

[–] PropaGandalf@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah fuck the state. Only overprotective, power hungry loosers work there anyways.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's also this gem at the end

Aylo can expect that law enforcement will continue watching Pornhub closely

ETA : if you don't read arstechnica, really , you should

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Also rages on.

[–] Extrasvhx9he 3 points 10 months ago
[–] CodeName@infosec.pub 57 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are they going to institute the same rules for every online streaming service? Because what if the parents don't set up controls and their kids watch an R rated movie?

This is the parents responsibility and there are tools to keep kids from seeing harmful content.

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you still thinking it's about kids and adult content? 😮‍💨

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

It’s clearly about trying to erase anonymity or even the pretense of it on the internet.
For the children and terrorists are just about always the excuse it starts with

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

"PornHub pulls out" 🙊

[–] dontblink@feddit.it 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What about sexual and emotional education in schools?

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The people who really think of age verification as effective measures tend to also be against having those in schools in the first place.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Oh they’ve wanted that gone forever.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

That would involve cutting 0.001% of the road budgets... Nope!!

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No one's made a "pulling out" joke yet?

[–] swag_money@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

other than the one in the title?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


To kick off the new year, Montana and North Carolina joined a growing number of states enforcing laws requiring age verification to access adult content online.

"While safety and compliance are at the forefront of our mission, giving your ID card every time you want to visit an adult platform is not the most effective solution for protecting our users, and in fact, will put children and your privacy at risk.”

According to CNN, Pornhub and its private equity owners, Ethical Capital Partners (ECP), are currently working with big tech companies to create new device-based age verification solutions.

Those efforts include lobbying Apple, Google, and Microsoft to "develop a technological standard that might turn a user’s electronic device into the proof of age necessary to access restricted online content."

A Pornhub spokesperson told Ars that the technology to accomplish device-based age verification "exists today," but "what is required is the political and social will to make it happen.

As a result of the investigation, in addition to scrutiny from state lawmakers, Aylo can expect that law enforcement will continue watching Pornhub closely.


The original article contains 992 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I’m also uncomfortable with device based age verification. That sounds an awful lot like a massive privacy violation that will have far more false positives and false negatives than are reasonable. It’s giving strong “AI face recognition” vibes