Autism

Everyone loves an active listener

I wrote about it on that other website a couple years ago, I'll link to archives of my posts there

Here's what I submitted to the Subnautica forum

Here's what I submitted to the Tasker forum

Tasker is an Android application that lets you automate many different things. One of its features is setting variables for use in your tasks–for example, I have a task sets the variable %Wallpaper to a random number between 1 and 152, and sets my phone wallpaper to DCIM/Backgrounds/%Wallpaper.png every time I turn on my screen, because I don't want to stay married to one specific wallpaper

You can also do math with variables, which allowed me to program the trilateration algorithm on this webpage into Tasker. All you need to input is your current depth, and your distance to each of three specific landmarks (oceanmarks?), and it'll do all the complicated squaring and adding and subtracting for you, and then give you a notification with your approximate coordinates–in testing, it's usually accurate to within about 10 meters, which is more than accurate enough for us to see whatever we're looking for.

I wish I could actually understand why the squaring and adding and subtracting gives you accurate coordinates, but you don't got to know what baking powder does to make good bread, you just gotta follow the recipe!

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !ksp@lemmy.world

An important aspect of the phrase "Artificial Intelligence" is the ever-moving goalposts. In the mid 20th century, a machine that could follow and perform mathematical instructions was an insane and exciting dream of intelligent machines. Then we got the first computers, and people went "yeah okay but they're not intelligent" and the research of AI went into machines that could make useful decisions. Then we got programmable algorithmic machines, which clearly were "cool but not intelligent like us yes?" and the dream of AI became machines that could learn. Then machines that could imagine. Then machines that could conceivably impersonate humans. Right now the next goalpost is a bit up in the air with everything from "must have deep understanding" and "must have agency" to "must have soul", but the most workable contender seems to be "can know truth".

ANYWAY

So using the late-middle-of-AI-history definition of AI, we have machines that can make decisions and learn, taking over some human tasks.

The same basic concept, the "Centrifugal Governor" or "PID controller" has been invented independently since at least the 17th century. A full PID has the capacity to look at the state of a system (Proportional), estimate how the system will change (Derivative), and remember how the system responds to change (Integral).

The first controllers like the mechanisms used by windmills, and later the "centrifugal governor" invented for steam engines, mechanically changes how high the windmill stone should be or how much steam should be let out of the boiler, based on how fast the machine is running. While simple, it literally replaced human labor and was more effective than the person standing around and moving the lever whenever something seemed to go faster or slower. These did the equivalence of multiplication using only gears, levers and centrifugal force.

Then later, we have machines that could perform derivation! Whitehead torpedoes from the 19th century used pressure sensors and gravity-aligned levers to determine how deep a torpedo was in the water, and whether it was gaining depth (tilted down) or gaining height (tilting up). Still purely mechanical, these could be programmed to remain at a fixed depth, and gently steer themselves to the correct one if they were off. This meant you could just throw them into the water pointing the right direction and away they went.

Later again, and still before electronics we had the first instance of - via very strict use of definitions here - machine learning. A pneumatic PID controller would calculate an integration over all error values. It was used by American warships as an auto-pilot of sorts. It steered the rudder to maintain a course, and "learned" via an inflated balloon whether its steering was sufficient or not. The latter part was necessary because wind or streams would turn the ship in a way that pure calculation could not predict.

Today we use PIDs everywhere to control temperatures and hobby drone balance and a million other things, and they tend to be electronic. But, you might still find a mechanical PD controller in your chainsaw if you open it up.

Some more source material to dig into: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_governor

This is unrelated but i feel like i see you in every thread i scroll through, very cool.

Well yes. The Ottoman empire during almost all of the colonial period was a serious powerhouse and major player; one where slavery was one of its major economic engines. And you can't really include any discussions about slavery in Europe without also including the Ottomans.

There is a trick to tracking it though. A lot of the relevant official records from the Empire don't track the movement of slaves or women.

If we're concerned about ethnicities, which we are here, the trick is they weren't. They would note the religion of slaves, and had a tendency to just lump all Africans as Muslims or Arabs(Arap). The documents we have that make notes about sub-Sarahan African slaves comes primarily from British or French people traveling through the markets or cities.

For a numerical example: half of the slaves in markets in Ottoman Cyprus between 1590 and 1640 were sub-saharan African. Of the remaining half, almost half of those were Russian, the rest Greek and Slavic.