Grey Nomads! You sound like Bandit Heeler lmao
Yesss, I knew this felt familiar when I posted it but couldn't quite place it. That's definitely at least one place I've seen the sentiment before.
!bluey@lemmy.world
No time for a bush wee!
Why tf does it matter what other people are doing. Other people get to do things that don't involve you. You're not the main character.
Not quite sure how your comment is relevant. I'm looking forward to being home, but RVs drive exceptionally slower for safety and aerodynamic reasons. I'll have to pass the ones driving past me while sitting at a restaurant, some for the second time.
Why is it a problem that you have to pass a slow-moving vehicle?
EDIT: this was a weird comment to get downvoted for. Not everyone drives, y'all - it was a genuine question, not one loaded with implication.
Can't speak for OP but where I live it's downright dangerous and often impossible. Single lane in each direction, no overtaking lanes to speak of.
I find the arrogance of RV drivers with 40 cars behind them refusing to pull over and let everyone pass to be one of the most illustrative aspects of the boomer mentality. I want them to die so bad.
Single lane in each direction
pull over and let everyone pass
Hey there, sounds like you've never driven a car before. No shame! I'm more than happy to clear up any confusion.
Typically, roads with a single lane in each direction are not elevated off the ground. Meaning there is a location known as the "side of the road" where people are able to pull off if they have car trouble or are impeding a huge line of traffic. Unfortunately, this "side of the road" i mentioned previously is typically dirt, meaning that it's very dangerous to pass from. In many regions where common courtesy exists, pulling over to the side of the road (refer to previous sentences if still unsure) is very much appreciated.
Hopefully this helps! If you're still feeling a little slack jawed about the whole thing, feel free to let me know :)
Typically, roads with a single lane in each direction are not elevated off the ground. Meaning there is a location known as the "side of the road" where people are able to pull off if they have car trouble or are impeding a huge line of traffic. Unfortunately, this "side of the road" i mentioned previously is typically dirt, meaning that it's very dangerous to pass from
Or it's a ditch you can get a car in to but not out of without employing a tow truck. This is the most common situation in single lane roads that don't have any alternative water management features. But you'd know that if you ever touched grass in your life.
Also go fuck yourself. Blocked.
There are plenty of stopping bays and rest areas, but no overtaking lanes. Rural Aus roads are SO GOOD, but it's where the caravans congregate every single day.
maybe it's a highway with just a single lane in either direction. maybe passing lanes are few and far between or non-existent. maybe it's dark and hard to find safe opportunities to pass. maybe there's a train of 5 rvs you'd have to pass all at once because there's no space to get back over between them. maybe the rv drivers don't care to use pull outs and let others past.
All of these things are exactly what happens in my area. I think the nearest 4 lane highway is about 4 hours away.
Ah, I was imagining a big American freeway like you see on TV. Thanks, that makes sense!
np! yeah, in my little corner of the US there are no big freeways near me, mostly just small highways with one lane in each direction, and yeah the frustration can be real when you're stuck behind a slow rv!
Easy! Being stuck behind a slow moving vehicle over significant distances, especially on long stretches where passing is not viable, results in notably greater travel time; often increasing trip duration by 25%, more if RVs cover the entire stretch.
An RV driver can stop anywhere in the comfort of their RV to eat food, use their restroom, stretch on their mattress for a nap. A driver in a car often deals with unsanitary and often broken facilities along those long countryside stretches. I have IBS; an RV can extend the time I have to experience gut-stabbing pain by half an hour only to reach a clogged toilet with blood smeared everywhere and then I'm stuck behind them again or I have to go use leaves in a bush.
Point is, sometimes people are in situations where getting somewhere faster is important and we've not even considering medical emergencies where every minute counts and emergency services are too far distant to intervene, if cell signal exists at all to reach them. RVs usually won't pull over to allow a person to pass despite their signals. It's just a shitty situation and the alternative presented by most who are free of disabilities, not going out to enjoy one's life in the fullest manner possible, at best lacks empathy.
Gotcha! All those "reasons why it might be bad/harmful/awkward to be stuck behind an RV" make sense, but what I was missing was that these RVs might be on roads where passing them isn't possible. Other commenters have clarified that. Thanks!
So how frequently do you think rv drivers should pull off to the side of the road to let cars pass them? I find it hard to believe they'll be having meals, restroom breaks, or naps with the frequency you desire. Also, I'm not sure what kind of road has room for you to pull off to the side of, but not an extra lane for passing. I also am not sure what roads you're talking about where an emergency vehicle is going to be stuck behind an RV for a long enough period for it to matter - if there's no closer hospital, then by the point an RV would make a difference between life or death they're probably just going to send out a helivac.
Just to be clear, I'm not an RV owner and I sympathize with your IBS. In fact I have no vehicle, and support plans for public transit and similar ways of reducing congestion and improving people's lives (like a lane solely for busses, taxis, and emergency vehicles, like several European cities have had success with). I just don't see a need to blame RVs for their slightly slower speeds, over systemic infrastructure issues that are the primary reason for congestion.
Sounds like you're not familiar with driving in the US. Passing along the shoulder is both illegal and incredibly dangerous. These long roads without passing lanes, often with frequent curves making a safe line of sight for passing impossible, create a situation in which courtesy is suggested: if traffic builds up behind while you travel drastically below the nominal speed of traffic with no opportunity to pass coming up, pull over to let them pass.
Unfortunately, the middle of nowhere exists and that's where people tend to vacation when they want to exist outside of a concrete jungle. The middle of nowhere also lacks funding for significant road infrastructure; that will not change and changing it would be so inordinately expensive that doing so would be foolish. The answer here is simple courtesy as a driver.
Also, emergency vehicles aren't going to be stuck behind am RV - they obligate everyone to pull over by law. The issue is that emergency vehicles do not exist in these areas. None. No help available. No funding, no people to do the job. The US is vast and significant portions of land exist with barely any residents.
You can also be sure that hospitals are at least an hour's drive away in these locations where no opportunity to pass exists. There's no way around it: someone impeding the flow of traffic significantly without allowing faster traffic to pass is dangerous, both because of emergencies and the inevitable human tendency to pass in risky situations due to frustration.
You're correct, I am unfamiliar with driving in the US - I've lived here my whole life, but have made it into my mind 20s without a license. Needless to say, I don't live in a particularly rural area (I live in a suburbs where I can ride my electric bike to nearby stores or the train to commute downtown). I wasn't trying to suggest people pass on the shoulder though. I hadn't thought of winding roads, but that's a fair point where there could potentially be two lanes but it's still not safe to pass. For the single lane scenario I still don't think it makes sense to suggest a giant RV regularly move into the shoulder (if it's even present), especially not "any time there is a car behind them" as has been suggested elsewhere in the thread.
Regardless, in general I think it's more important to strive for systemic solutions rather than expecting/hoping for/pressuring all individuals to act in the way you want. In this case, since we're talking about rural areas, I think fixing our broken rail network would help immensely. Building the network and corresponding culture around trains for inter city travel would be cheaper for individuals and the government, better for the environment, would allow everyone on board to relax, and it'd even be faster than driving. For popular vacation locations the frequency could even be high enough to eliminate the last barrier of it being on a sometimes inconvenient schedule! Now, of course the locations themselves may not be easily traversable without a car (and trust me I'm aware of how often that applies), but if you're trying to escape concrete jungles anyways then perhaps walking around was the goal anyways. Otherwise, you can probably rent a car (or a bike!) and still save money compared to the fuel and maintenance cost on driving the vehicle there.
If there is a car behind your RV, use the very next turnout to let quicker traffic pass.
Hell even in a car there's a car behind you most of the time. I can't believe your suggesting they literally detour at every single moment. That's adding a hell of a lot more than 25% to the trip duration
At least someone got my point, thank you.
Probably should just unsubscribe from memes while you're ahead.
gatekeeping memes, fantastic
Eh - I did, but other commenters pointed out that it's not always possible to pass them depending on road conditions, so I'm with them.
How about you use one of the million turn outs and let faster traffic by?
Are you suggesting rv drivers regularly take random detours so as to not "inconvenience" other drivers? Dude, just let them get to where they're going
Less that, more just going over to the side to let faster vehicles pass and then continuing on. It is just common courtesy to everyone else driving faster vehicles, and is at least something taught to do in Swedish driving schools.
I don't think that's what the previous commenter was suggesting, but sure slower vehicles being in the rightmost lane makes sense and is also taught in American driving schools.
When there isn’t another lane there’s turnouts where slower vehicles can slow down and maybe have to stop depending on how long you clogged up the road behind you.
No matter what the discussion is about there's always someone taking it personal
