Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
Google hasn’t reached “subscription service for printer ink” levels of enshitiffication, but the trend line is clear and it will do nothing but accelerate.
The VC model of growth at all costs is inherently flawed, but it makes quarterly profit projections, and that’s all they care about.
Right up until it crashes, and our tax money subsidizes their losses. Then fire up the casino again and start the clock on the next economic collapse.
doesn't matter to them if they diversify their investments enough... there's always at least one segment of the market that sees growth in the collapse. the system works just fine for them.
doesn't matter if everyone else suffers for it.
They don't need the subscription. They make money collecting data and serving ads. They aren't going to charge for that like microsoft does. They aren't that shortsighted.
This current change is to elbow out computers that use cookies for tracking. They are going to be using the browser and they control most browsers. You need to use Safari or Firefox to get away from them. Still safari follows chrome because they have the same heritage of web engine and Google pays apple billions each year. Firefox is also heavily supported by Google, so there's implicit implications involved for Firefox being too different from chrome.
Damn, you beat me to it
Even if Chrome weren't spyware, allowing Google to have hegemony over web standards would still be objectively bad.
They control most browsers because they control the chromium engine most use. The control safari because they forked it's WebKit engine and can pull apple by the tail to follow them. The fund Firefox so they can influence them by withdrawing funding - they don't need contract terms just an implication.
They positioned themselves as the alternative to internet explorer, but they have become internet explorer. Websites aren't following web standards their following Google's standards.
The frustration thing is the best way to avoid this is to not use Chrome based browsers, especially because not all website work correctly in Firefox.
The only time I've ever used Chrome is when a website requires it (and fuck those sites). It's gone from a lousy browser to one that's downright evil.