Approved! (lemmy.fmhy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by EarJava@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] MurdoMaclachlan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Image Transcription: Twitter

Giray Özil, @girayozil

Ask a programmer to review 10 lines of code, he'll find 10 issues. Ask him to do 500 lines and he'll say it looks good.

I am a human who transcribes posts to improve accessibility on Lemmy. Transcriptions help people who use screen readers or other assistive technology to use the site. For more information, see here.

[-] Zana@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago

Good bot.

[-] beigeoat@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a human transcriber

[-] vahtos@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Good human

[-] BenLloydPearson@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Y'all need to get yourselves some PR review automation in place. Stop wasting time on trivial reviews and requesting changes for common problems so that when you ping a colleague for a code review, they know it's important rather than a simple request for a thumbs up.

[-] fusio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's why PR should be small. It's much better to have multiple PRs than a single big one.

Totally fair to have gigantic PR full of boilerplate code, but generally you can split the boilerplate and your feature in 2 PRs, where only the feature will get a proper review.

All of this obviously depends on the criticality of the system :p

[-] Rikudou_Sage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Or split them per commit at the minimum if you don't want to create a separate PR.

[-] Asifall@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That can lead to another problem though, which is that if a developer knows a merge is only part of the whole change, it becomes easy to assume any issues will be handled elsewhere.

[-] learningduck@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

How do you improve on this?

1 bigger PRs, but with multiple smaller commits, so reviews can review by commits?

[-] jmk1ng@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

LGTM!

[-] Rob@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Let’s Gamble, Try Merging!

[-] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Why. Whyyyyyy people need to comment this always? Why isn't just the Approve button enough? I so much hate it.

[-] qwop@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, that's too boring. I have a range of responses to pick from to keep things interesting:

LGTM
Nice
Looks good
Thanks
Looks great
:thumbsup:
Looks good to me
:shipit:

For me, no text means "I haven't really reviewed this properly so don't want to write anything that could be used against me if (when?) this breaks something in prod"

[-] GTG3000@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

In my experience, the managers get confused when issues/PRs are closed without any comment.
Useless comments beat having them pop into your slack to ask "hey, did you review this?" with a link to an approved PR.

[-] HorseWife@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

If you're in a place with codebase analytics you want to have at least one comment on every MR - otherwise the system will start to think you're falling behind... I hate codebase analytics.

[-] IWriteDaCode@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Analytics software like that has made my professional life so annoying at many times.

[-] midas@ymmel.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Really grinds my gears to get a review request for a huge PR with almost no context and no instructions on how to run the code / test data.

I've even had one guy ask for a review who hadn't even manually tested his own codes happy path. Sure he wrote some unit tests and those ran but once you actually tried using the code in the app all kinds of exceptions and weird situations came up. No idea how people dare do that shit.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

True, but the 10 line change can me merged two weeks from now and it won't make any difference. If you let the 500 line merge languish for two days you'll have screwed up the work of three other programmers.

[-] Ser_Salty@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

If a programmer does 500 lines, how much work will they get done before their heart explodes?

[-] Astiolo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This can be called the bike shed effect or Law of Triviality. It's not just programming where a simple digestible idea will be contested because it's easy to poke holes, while something more complicated and more consequential is much harder, so it gets little to no resistance.

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I know this implies that the reviewer didn’t care to read the bigger PR, but I think this might actually be legit. If your PR is only 10 lines long, then chances are those lines are very dense, or intricate in some other way. However, if you submit 500 lines, then it’s probably mostly boilerplate code with trivial adaptions.

No-one in their right mind would submit 500 lines of substantial code.

[-] kabat@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Has no one here ever worked on a new project or even a new feature in a decently sized codebase? Working exclusively in maintenance / minor change mode has to be exhausting.

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Depends on what you classify as “minor change”. When I took up my first professional project, I found a plethora of little things to improve which would make users happy. That was very satisfying.

On the other hand, writing yet another module that displays a list of Foos, lets the user create a Foo, show the details of Foo, update it, and delete a Foo, becomes dull quickly, despite being a “new feature”.

load more comments