this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
274 points (98.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29793 readers
826 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If the descentralization of social networks continue, we will have to prepare for the eventual rise of the instances wars, where people will start to fight about which instance is better and which one is weird to be in and so on, but that's for the future of us all.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

The biggest problem with lemmy and decentralization right now is that for optimal performance you need to spread out the load relatively evenly between instances. The problem is that users tend to go where other users are (otherwise why go there) and that naturally leads to clumping on one or few instances which causes it to overload.

The way to solve it is to avoid having generic "anything goes" instances and instead have instances be focused on a specific topic. For example, have gaming instance, a personal finance/investing instance, all things home ownership and improvement instance, etc. You can have multiple communities per instance as long as they stay within the same general topic. This way users will naturally spread out by subscribing to different instances based on topics they're interested in. And that will solve the performance issue we're seeing with lemmy.world or other popular instances.

[–] CatfishSushi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty much brand new to lemmy but the thought of having to switch instances to see cooking conversations after conversing about Raspberry Pi projects in a different instance just seems unwieldy. But I guess as long as my instances are all federating with each other I don't need to switch instances. I'm a technical guy but this needs to be easier for joe sixpack or it's not going to catch on. And if it doesn't catch on there's going to be less interesting content...

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correct, as long as the instance your account is in federated with all other instances you're subscribed to, you don't have to switch accounts.

Now, defederation is another issue if you want to see the widest possible amount of content. What's going to happen is ideologically opposed instances are going to defederate each other, so left-wing instances are going to defederate right-wing ones and vice versa. So if you're a user who wants to see the content from both sides, you'll have to create multiple accounts in each "cluster" of federated instances. It's kind of annoying to be honest, it makes it hard to discover communities just because your instance admin decided to defederate from them and encourages echo chambers, but it it's the best we've got.

[–] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another way to solve the issue is to have users and communities be instance-independent where the instances only provide storage for communities and users they want to support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Migillope@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would this require you to switch between instances to view all the content you wish to follow? That doesn't seem very appealing as a user.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, you can see all the content from all instances you're subscribed to, as long your instance admin hasn't defederated from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chuckle_Puck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am subscribed to Ukraine on sopuli.xyz and memes in lemmy.ml and a few others on Lemmy.world and they all show up in my feed, so I'm now more confused. Am I viewing several instances or not? Lmao

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] geekosaur@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't we kinda already have them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SomeOtherUsername@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Interesting to hear this from a dirty lemmy.fmhy.ml-er! 😈

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

Only real motherfuckers post on general communities from their lemmynsfw account

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

Those tankies ain't getting me!

[–] doopen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What if there was an app that let you log in to multiple lemmy accounts at once, aggregated the lot into one seamless feed, and used the relevant account for each interaction? Maybe even going as far as to automatically cross-post any submission to duplicate communities and aggregate that too.

[–] Flemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I'm actually working on this haha.

It's definitely a v2 feature, but it's in the works

[–] 21racecar12@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Use wefwef.app

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This would be the best of all worlds. Instances get to choose who to federate with, users get to choose want instances to use.

Sign me up.

[–] credo@toot.community 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@doopen @macisr I’m not sure why you would need multiple accounts actually. (Posted from mastodon).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EgyptUrnash@pawb.social 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have been running a Mastodon instance since like 2016/17 and this has been quietly happening for the entire time I've been on the fediverse. (I can't check the exact date right now as I'm in the middle of upgrading it.)

Do you want to be in the Anime Girl Who Posts Nazi Memes Fediverse? How about the Queer Furry Fediverse? Or maybe you'd rather be in the Mocking Shitposts Fediverse? Perhaps you want the Everyone Has A Photo Of A Human And Thinks Federating With Facebook's Activitypub Is Actually A Good Idea Fediverse? Or how about the TERF/Gender-Critical Fediverse? Or the "Standalone" Social Site That Is Actually A Fediverse Instance With Federation Disabled And The Credits Removed In Violation Of The Source License?

Some of these Fediverses will happily talk with others. Some of them will rapidly defederate from others as soon as they encounter a place that clearly belongs to a Fediverse they are incompatible with. Some of them quickly get defederated from the Fediverses they are incompatible with. Some of them look at the #fediblock tag, some to keep aware of places worth pre-emptively blocking to make a chill place to talk, some to look for fellow people who have been cast out of someone else's chill zones.

[–] njtrafficsignshopper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this a bad thing? I thought kind of, curating who you associate with is one of the benefits

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pseu@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that's exactly what's supposed to happen. Instance wars and eventual defederation and fragmentation are important moderation tools, and will progress the culture and feel of instances and regions of the Fediverse. Many instances will form federated [cliques](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique_(graph_theory) that are highly connected and have similar vibes and cultures, and some will be federated with multiple cliques, showing users a variety of cultures and situations.

If the Fediverse reaches a large enough number of people, it can support multiple independant cliques, and enable users see entire mini-universes with different communities and vibes.

[–] oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

imma have undercover alts everywhere for the sole purpose of getting all the cats communities in one page.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Your legend well be carved into the pages of history as the first person to complete the catalog!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

One benefit that people don't talk about enough is it naturally tends towards smaller community sizes than in a centralized system which is a better fit for our tribal human brains.

We're not great with speaking into a room with 1,000 people in it, much less a million.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] dottedgreenline@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I truly hope this type of hierarchical thinking can stay fun and not create the kind of grating pomposity that pervades every bloody animalistic thing. I want us to grow beyond childish competitiveness.

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ladder of evolution speed run commence

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely. I don't think that's a bad thing.

What I do worry about somewhat is multiple forks of the codebase that differ so much as to cause bugs when instances try to interoperate.

[–] thesanewriter@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago

My personal hope is that the ActivityPub standard prevents this from happening. After all, I've seen decent federation between Lemmy and KBin and they're entirely different platforms, nevermind a fork of the same software.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There is nothing better than a good old tribe war.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One of the oldest human pastimes, hating people who are different from you in some way, no matter how inconsequential.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (25 children)

This will likely follow a similar pattern to email, since it's starting from a very similar position.

At some point people will begin to assign identities to instances and imagine (rightly or wrongly) that being on an instance says something about a person. People do that with cars, shoes, and yes, even email domains.

From a technical perspective, right now Lemmy is as anonymous as can be — I've yet to see an instance that requires ANY kind of verification. I didn't need to provide an email address, phone number, or any other identifying information to sign up. Didn't even need to solve a captcha. I just choose a name and set a password and BOOM! I was in.

Once upon a time, email worked this way, too. Then came the spammers, scammers, and other bad actors, and this was deemed untenable. Nowadays, any email provider that allows anonymous signup is likely to be blocked by most of the email-using world. You won't be able to use them to sign up for other services, and you might not even have your mail accepted by other providers.

This will definitely become a problem as Lemmy becomes popular, and instance admins will need to crack down, lest they be overrun and defederated by the rest of the world.

I'm not sure what the answer is. This is a problem that has not been adequately solved, IMHO. A few bad apples spoil the bunch. That's been true since long before the Internet.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] razza856@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so the owners and mods of instances will have to compete to provide a good experience. I don’t see a problem with this

[–] flashmedallion@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who does that select for though.

Those with the most time? The most money? The most aggressive approach?
Competition doesn't tend to produce holistic quality; only efficiency.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The big problem is going to be when someone decides to start spamming and vote manipulating with bot populated private instances that automatically re-spawn themselves under a new name whenever they are blacklisted. Eventually, the standard will have to move to whitelisting over blacklisting, and once that happens the whole premise of federation starts to fall apart.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not harder than what we’ve had to do with e-mail spam. Which has been enormously successful, with 99% of it not even getting delivered to your spam folder but just dropped entirely.

Instances will het as much visibility as they’ve earned through successful engagement across instances. The visibility of a new instance’s posts will increase over time.

This is why yes, there needs to be a feed algorithm. “Just show it to me chronologically” is the most naive thought, and people still have it all the time. There are just so many fundamental things that need to go into a sorting algo. We’re not even talking about personalization.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Isn't it already? Lemmygrad, exploding-heads and other extremist instances have already been defederated. But the main feature is the federation itself, which also creates powerful alliances between instances with common values. Platform-wise, it will be just a matter of difference of use and leaning, but federation alliances will work the same

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Lemmygrad is still federated with a lot of the big instances and not very extreme tbh.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] god@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

It has already started :) I'd say around 60% of major instances block exploding-heads, burggit and/or lemmygrad. Lemmygrad and EH in turn defederate a shitton of instances as well due to ideological reasons. Most "civility" or "law" related instances block piracy instances. The dbzer0 piracy instance blocks anything seen as too right-wingy cuz the owner is an anarchocommunist or something. LGBT instances are blocking & promoting for other instances to block instances that aren't too friendly to LGBT or are simply not moderating or even promoting homophobia & related topics. I actually made a tool called federation-checker.vercel.app/ that checks where an instance stands in the federation "war", so I know what instances to register onto if I wanna see some content that has been blocked by the instances I'm on.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ZombieZookeeper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Begun, the instance wars have.

load more comments (2 replies)

How about a red-blue team style hacking tournament, but battle royale?

[–] Odusei@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This very much feels to me like the beginning of a Civ game, where we're all fresh nations with different starting conditions that are exploring our territories and building up armies....

The first schism is gonna be fairly dramatic, I'll bet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bosa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ya there probably will be, but in the end it doesn't matter which is the beauty of this platform.

[–] gthutbwdy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Email is federated as well, but I never saw anything I could call email instance wars. You can use whichever you want, no one really cares.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›