this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15250 readers
30 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Hope so. Love it. Fuck plastic where it's not needed.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I'm noticing more brands embracing cardboard spools and I'm for it

They're easier to recycle

My only issue is when they're full they squeak on my filament holder during printing, but I'm planning to fix that... Eventually.

[–] KaJashey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Eryone has been doing this since at least last year.

[–] NiyaShy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If companies that still used plastic spools are starting to switch to cardboard, I think that's a good thing. Not only is it easier to recycle, but probably also lighter (your typical 1kg filament spool weighs around 200-300g), so the bulk should save some fuel for transportation.

Though I personally prefer using no spool at all (during shipping) 😉 Wherever possible I buy Masterspool refills.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the spool is frequently included in the weight of the roll, so you're getting 1kg either way. you get more plastic for printing, though.

[–] NiyaShy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh, that would be deceiving marketing, a 1kg spool should contain 1kg of filament...
But hey, maybe my view on this is a bit warped because I only buy filament from reputable brands (and usually from their own store) and not from marketplaces like "big A" where hundreds of sellers battle to be the cheapest.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

It’s not a “reputable” thing … it’s a process thing. Scales don’t get zeroed every time a fresh spool is loaded. Doing so adds complexity.

It’s pretty common for consumer goods to include the mass of packaging when the product is sold by mass across most industries.

[–] 0235@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have had cardboard spools for a while. I am on the fence. They are much easier to recycle (no matter how many 1million and 1 uses for plastic spools exist). however they creak horribly on my spool holder, and are much larger than most of the similar weight poly spools i have, so i had to create bespoke spool holders for all 3 printers i have!

[–] valeen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't seem to work very well with the AMS system from Bambu. Good news is can occasionally transplant them to a reusable (and printable too) spool.

[–] 0235@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what I sometimes do, transfer a bit of filament to a mini roll. There are a few decent files out there for re-spooling out there.

As environmental shakey 3d printing is, I am happy to be inconvenienced by cardboard spools, as that is one disposable things we can make not-plastic.

[–] valeen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

One interesting use for the ams system is automatic filament switching for when you want to finish a spool that has ??? Kg of filament left and you need a print to finish over night. Throw the questionable one in slot one and the new one in slot two, tell they system they are they same and it will switch over on run out.

[–] CobraA1@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a trend, away from the plastic spools which were decidedly made from a non-recyclable plastic.

It's always been curious to me that recyclable plastic was never even considered to be an option.

That said - cardboard is recyclable and biodegradable, so it's good no matter how you dispose of it.

But - it does have environmental downsides. If not carefully sourced, the wood can come from places where deforestation is a problem. It's also rather energy intensive to make, so depending on the energy source can contribute to CO2 emissions.

Nothing will be perfect, but cardboard is likely better than the alternatives.

[–] JohnEdwa@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

"Save the rainforests, use plastic instead!" really didn't age well.