this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
425 points (96.9% liked)

People Twitter

7699 readers
593 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I mean, I see your point, but a shop here sells spaghetti in what's practically a paper envelope and that just feels like the right way to package spaghetti, on so many levels.

[–] Pietson@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

I don't see how that can't be improved by a window. We can do it for real envelopes after all, so that the letters can look out at the world.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now I'm wondering how susceptible pasta is to going bad faster when exposed to light... Are we paying more for worse pasta because of marketing!?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pasta was traditionally dried under sunlight, so I'd expect that to just not really be a thing...

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago

Huh. How about that...

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Everything here except the one expensive brand is just full plastic packaging. The one expensive brand used to have the window, but now removed it for environmental reasons.

When I realizes this I decided to switch to the more expensive brand, even if I'm very much paying for brand name, in the end it doesn't matter to me if a pack of spaghetti costs 89 cents or 2.09€ (even if it's like half my diet), but especially given the problems of microplastic I can't justify buying plastic packaged noodles.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You mean the addition of single-use plastic to packaging that doesn't need it?

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Aren't those windows often cellophane, not plastic?

Not that I'm aware of

(Warning: greenwashing link) https://www.barilla.com/en-gb/box

This company states that they used to use plastic in their packaging, so I'd imagine with other brands, it's common as well.

Cellophane by itself does not prevent water vapor from entering the packaging unless coated with highly flammable material, so not sure how much companies use that.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No ethical consumption etc

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Disagree, you have to remove that window to recycle the rest of the packaging. I specifically look for the ones with no window if possible

[–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Is that less work than taking it out for recycling though?

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Can confirm. Our Eastern Bloc pasta didn't have windows under communism.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm willing to find common ground with the capitalists if they're willing to concur that this is their crowning achievement.

[–] wmcduff@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago