this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
722 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5130 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Senator’s bid to make US military support conditional on whether Israel is violating human rights in Gaza fails by 72 votes to 11

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 195 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unsurprising. Thank you, Bernie, for trying.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 113 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Every time America is about to/in the process of making a mistake there's a video of Bernie Sanders warning everyone not to do it.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 34 points 9 months ago

Our very own Cassandra of Troy.

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Bernie is a national treasure, we don't deserve him

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 98 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Sanders is proof the US is working on a rigged system

he has had the people's interest at heart since he first started his political career in the 60s and not just the US citizens

[–] ExfilBravo@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

He will inspire a group of young people that will actually make the change when boomers die. So there's that.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (15 children)

The two party thing has been going for 150 years. The top will not ever allow change in the regime.

Sanders almost won in 2016 but the DNC actively conspired against him to run Hillary. The Democrats will rather lose than allow the system to change.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 81 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Anyone got a list of who supported it?

Edit: so far I found that it was Sanders (duh), Rand Paul, and 9 democrats. Not sure who

Edit 2: per https://www.businessinsider.com/which-senators-voted-bernie-sanders-resolution-israel-human-rights-violations-2024-1?amp

Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky

Democratic Sen. Martin Heinrich of New Mexico

Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont

Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland

Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts

Democratic Sen. Laphonza Butler of California

Democratic Sen. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico

Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii

Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont

Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Anyone got a list of who abstained? I want to do the math so I know how large the Senate Genocide Caucus is.

EDIT: I was trying to do math and kept overlooking how the article said that it was 72-11, which would mean 17 abstaining or absent. The Senate Genocide Caucus is 72 members wide.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If my arithmetic is correct, the Senate Genocide Caucus consists of 2 Independents, 32 Republicans, and 37 Democrats.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

=71. You're short 1. (vote was 72-11)

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I see what I did. I subtracted from 48 Republicans instead of 49. The Senate Genocide Caucus has 2 Independents, 33 Republicans, and 37 Democrats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

Rand Paul accidentally stumbles into the correct opinion.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Rand (and Ron) Paul always confuses me.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What's there to be confused about?

Ron is a soft-spoken man who stood firm in his convictions, and was quietly friendly with white nationals and other horrible people. He's retired now.

Rand is a bit of a blow hard with no convictions, and is loudly friendly with white nationals and other horrible people. He's a sitting senator.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because compared to other nameable Republicans, he occasionally votes in ways that are agreeable with many leftists. But like you said, he's also still a massive piece of shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 60 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Voting List for Anyone Interested

Fuck everyone that continues to support this genocide.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Important to note that this is a motion to table - so the "Yea" vote means they disagree with Bernie's resolution.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

39 Democrat senators (40 if you count Sinema) and 32 Republican senators.

I'd also like to remind people that 44 Democrats and 36 Republican senators voted to block the rail strike.

Procorporate trash. All of them. Fuck Joe Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DuckOverload@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Bernie Sanders is obviously a raging anti-Semite.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

The ADL just declared that Jewish Voice for Peace are antisemitic so Bernie probably isn't far behind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpiceyDejarik@lemm.ee 46 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The measure was a first-of-its-kind tapping into a decades-old law that would require the US state department to, within 30 days, produce a report on whether the Israeli war effort in Gaza is violating human rights and international accords. If the administration failed to do so, US military aid to Israel, long assured without question, could be quickly halted.

Those senators must be pretty confident that a report would find human rights violations. Why would they oppose it otherwise?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago

if only democrats actually stood for what they say they stand for

we could of had eight years of bernie instead of eight years of further decline with trump and biden

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

if you think israel didn't do anything wrong, why oppose an investigation?

(also milosevic did the same thing in the 90s and was prosecuted for it by the icc - the us supported that then)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 27 points 9 months ago

Sigh, the US government never fails to disappoint.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

During the Sheikh Jarrah incident I contacted everyone who politically represents me and told them to re-evaluate how freely they fund Isreal, they all gave me lots of lip service telling me they will consider it when opportunities arise and every last one of them voted against this. I don't think I've ever in my life been accurately represented politically on a federal level, and the only reason that's not true locally is because I've testified to local government committees on things that actually made it to the state house floor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Doesn’t look like there are many scruples left in DC.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

There weren't any in the first place.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

This is the stupidest timeline.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 16 points 9 months ago (8 children)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Geopolitics overrides morality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

as is tradit

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Warren also voted with Sanders.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm supposed to believe the Dems that voted against this also care about saving democracy? They don't even care about basic human rights. We're going full speed into the worst timeline.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What did anyone expect? Both sides take military industrial complex money

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It sometimes feels like Bernie Sanders is the only American leader with an actual heart.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 9 months ago

I knew he was "my guy" when I finally realized who he was in 2016. There was a time I watched a lot of documentaries, and every time this scraggly haired old dude was shown in some random clip of Congress doing their thing in relation to the documentary, he was always on the right side of the argument. So I see Bernie Sanders running and I said "oh shit, it's that guy!"

No wonder the media demonizes him...

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Well, at least it was the right method. They didn't hide behind Biden.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Proud of my Senator, Martin Heinrich. He did the right thing today.

[–] ooli@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isnt that a proof that Israel dont respect human rights?

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is more proof that the US doesn't give a shit.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It's more proof that the US does give a shit, and that the US prefers that human rights not be respected.

load more comments
view more: next ›