The vast majority of us are normal, we need to reinforce that from time to time.
Currently standing at a demonstration in Nuremberg. Lots of passionate people here.
I really, really hope AfD gets banned. Germany has strong anti-hate protections, but enforcement on small groups is avoided because they're too small and not worth the trouble/attention, and enforcement on large groups is avoided because they're too large and powerful, so it's barely useful.
Canada often does the same thing.
Remember there’s a petition going to take that party’s leader’s right to be elected: https://aktion.campact.de/weact/hocke-stoppen/teilnehmen (link is German)
That's the wrong way if doing this. We need to pull out the rag of under those, that vote for him and his shitty stuff, we also have to pressure the media to do better and present more facts instead of opinions...and so on. Back to the roots, basically
The voters don’t care about facts. That’s the problem. We need to dismantle that party while we still have democratic (read: sane) people in charge, because arguing with someone who thinks COVID was a hoax to suppress the people or that the government has a secret agenda to replace the German population with muslims is futile.
Dismantling the party wont change a thing. In fact, it make things worse, because it alienates and radicalizes those people even more.
radicalizes those people even more
Tell me, what comes after “Let’s deport all non-Germans”?
"Let's all gas/exterminate them"?
It only does that to a minority of them, not the majority of the group.
The people who vote AfD don't follow the mainstream conservative media, so probably don't even know there are protests, like Trump supporters who follow news outlets that support Trump. It would help if, for example, a number of famous football teams were brought in to promulgate a more inclusive message. That would likely be more effective than a few minutes on the ARD or ZDF News.
Good
Isn't "silent majority" the term used by the American far right?
Since this article is coming from Germany, the term used locally would be "schweigende Mehrheit". This is based on Elisabeth Noelle-Neumanns work on the spiral of silence:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_of_silence
In this case the head of the German Verfassungsschutz (one of the spy agencies tasked with fighting extremism) asked the silent majority to stand up against right wing extremism and Nazism and therefore this term is used here. Those american far right idiots don't have anything to do with it. Could be that they heard something about Noelle-Neumanns work and didn't understand it, but even that is unlikely
It's a cunning technique to make any perspective seem like the one "everyone" agrees with. Because of course they agree with us... They just don't say it out loud because [reasons] but they agree really.
I sure fucking WISH the American fear right were silent.
It's used as a lie by the American right. It doesn't have the same associations everywhere.
It's a lie wherever it's spoken, the delusion that "the people really agree with me, even though no one shows up or says anything."
It's just obvious rhetorical deception on its very face, anyone can claim it for any thing at any time because it just means "I don't have proof the people support my policies."
If anything the "silent majority" staging a mass protest against a still minority party just proves no majority in a democracy is silent.
But sadly they still have a lot of voters and will be probably one of the winners in the next election phase....
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/