350
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mambabasa@slrpnk.net 68 points 10 months ago

FYI, this is a right-wing dog whistle popularized during the COVID-19 pandemic. It's now an anti-vaxxer talking point.

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 37 points 10 months ago

If the carbon is in my body, it's not in the atmosphere where it would contribute to climate change. Checkmate, atheists

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

So if I keep gaining weight, I'll trap even more carbon in my body! It's a flawless plan

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

You should get paid carbon credits!

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Does McDonald's accept carbon credits though?

[-] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Nuh uh! You can't checkmate me if I

[Rage flips the board]

[-] badbrainstorm@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

I am the cabrón you say?!?

[-] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] CIWS-30@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

Yes, you are the GOAT!

[-] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 10 months ago

Negative, you are 65% oxygen, so in effect hot air. 18.5% is carbon, 10% is hydrogen.

Or by molecules, you are mostly water.

And by those metrics, the average vehicle exhaust from a year of driving contains as much carbon and oxygen as 300 humans.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Yes. this is a truly shitty post.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 10 points 10 months ago

Nice schizopost

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

You don’t know what carbon is do you?

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

So we're sequestering carbon.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately, we are quite the opposite. We are CO2 generators.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago

The CO2 we breathe out is a rounding error compared to the emissions from our fossil fuel use. It's frankly laughable to even compare the two.

[-] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

My super power is methane emission.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I never said we were good at it.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

So, why do you do it then?

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I didn't bring it up. The meme posted by OP did because it's a schizopost implying that the evil lizard people want to genocide the common people to preserve the climate.

Your comment was talking about the fact that humans exhale CO2 as an unfortunate fact. I agree with that in and of itself, but in the context of the post one could definitely get the idea that you're propagating the malthusian and exaggerated assumption that the meme is built on. That's how I interpreted it.

If there's no people exhaling CO2, then who would be left to enjoy the infinitessimally better state of the climate?

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, technically, we sequester some CO2 seeing as how we're partially made from it but yeah, I was mostly joking.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Technically, we sequester zero CO2. We only consume already sequestered carbon. We do not convert even single molecule of CO2 in to carbon.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unless we have tiny amounts photosynthesizing algie or something similar living in our hair or under your skin. But that also gets into questions of what is you exactly.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

We sequester it for a brief time and are very bad at it.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

About 17 tones of co2 is emitted per person per year in the US. That's about 200x more carbon emitted than your whole body weight each year, not all of which is carbon. Plus that's not even mentioning that your body weight doesn't contribute to global warming.

https://www.wri.org/insights/charts-explain-per-capita-greenhouse-gas-emissions#:~:text=But%20among%20the%20top%2010,just%202.5%20tCO2e%20per%20person.

[-] Chev@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

What are you talking about? Who is them? Why would anybody care about that little bit of carbon in your body when every single human "consumes" much more every day?

[-] irdc@derp.foo 5 points 10 months ago

Akhctually, when you burn something you oxidise it instead of reducing it.

[-] Moc@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I’m overweight, so I wouldn’t mind

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Better than being oxidized, I guess.

[-] notatoad@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Speaking as one of “them”, yes. Yes you are.

[-] bappity@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

where is Jessica Hyde?

[-] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Edit: Since people seem to think I'm saying abating climate change causes fewer children, I'm not. Communication is not my strongpoint - but I have a B.B.A in Econ with an emphasis in Sustainable Supply Chains, and a Master's in Quantitative Finance, so let me rephrase this. Countries that implement more policies to fight climate change are typically populated by people who care and are educated about climate change, who are also less likely to have more children due to the current path humanity is on.

Something vaguely related to this topic is the fact that countries with more laws designed to abate climate changing effects are also experiencing a slowdown in the rate with which they have children. Whereas many countries with relatively high birthrates generally do not have very strict climate standards. Overall levels of general education also play into this.

Tldr; Generally, the more people know about climate change, the less likely they are to have children.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Correlation not causation etc

[-] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Right. There are many factors at play that lead to these outcomes, and there are always outliers

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 9 points 10 months ago

Yeah and selling ice cream leads to shark attacks 🙄

Countries with a well-educated population care more about the future of the planet and well-educated people have fewer kids. There's no "climate childlessness" like you seem to be implying.

[-] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I didn't say they are experiencing these slowdowns because of abatement policies, like you said with shark attacks and ice cream. Read my edit. I think I'm being misunderstood, and I don't think I clearly communicated what I was trying to. Your second paragraph literally summarized what I was trying to convey, which I thought I did in the tldr, but I'm better at numbers and graphs than I am with words lol.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
350 points (80.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

25103 readers
3690 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS