this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
1091 points (94.8% liked)

Political Memes

5494 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] violetraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's amazing the people that deliberately avoid "CRT" topics and push defunding schools do not know the events ov Blair mountain, the bombing of MOVE in Philadelphia, and/or black wall street. Absolutely shocked!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (6 children)

72 million gun owners seems low to me...

Here's a stat that pegs the total number of guns at around 434 million and just under 20 million AR-15s.

https://www.guns.com/news/2020/11/17/data-us-has-434-million-guns-20m-ars-150m-mags

At only 72 million gun owning homes, that would mean, on average, 6 guns per gun owner?

https://americangunfacts.com/gun-ownership-statistics/

22% of gun owners have only a single firearm. So if the 72 million number is correct, that means 15,840,000 single gun owners, and the remaining 418,160,000 guns are owned by 56,160,000, or 7.45 guns per owner.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sounds about right. I grew up in central Missouri, and while relatively few of my friends had guns, the one that did had a goddamn arsenal in his bedroom. Two shotguns, three rifles, and a "big" handgun that all stayed in a gun safe, and a .22 pistol he kept under the bed "for safety." And that was just his room, as a high schooler... His brother and his mother both had other weapons of their own.

Even people who are just hobby shooters or hunters rather than 2A "mah guns" weirdos like said friend was tend to accumulate weapons over time. It's like any other hobby in that regard.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, there are a lot of shades of gray for multiple gun owners.

  • Own a single handgun for self defense
  • Own a single rifle for hunting
  • Own both of the above
  • Own different rifles for hunting different animals
  • Own a Shotgun for hunting birds (plus some combination of the above)
  • Own an old/historic gun more as an art piece (but it's functional if wanted)
  • Owns a fucking arsenal

Add in the fact that some people sort of end up collecting guns the way some people collect guitars...I wouldn't be so quick to turn away from the original statistic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HumanPenguin@lemmy.cafe 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

LHaving met a good few gun fans. Yeah 7 to 8 guns seems like a low average.

Helped a friend move from a apartment to a new house. Over 15 guns. I say over as he also had a number of parts. I do not know enough to know if complete guns could be built. Looked like a few complete guns possible to my non gun fan eyes.

This was when I lived in GA. He was not considered unusual by most of the friends helping us.

What seems less likely to me. Is all 72m around the US siding with Texas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 14 points 10 months ago

Oh, the math in this is all kinds of fucked up. OPOP knows stats exists, they just haven't met it personally.

Not all 72M gun owners live in Texas, and not all of the ones that do support these turds. They mention an AR15 stat, and then completely ignore it in the conclusion.

Also, as someone else reponded, yeah: 6 guns per owner seems about right on average. I have 6: two rifles and 4 handguns. And there are a few more I'd like to collect; I wouldn't be surprised if I had 10 or 11, eventually. It's a hobby, and I like to shoot. And I don't even hunt; hunters are going to have different guns for differrent game, and might have even more than average.

It's a hobby, and like hobbies, the people who are into it are going to own predominantly more of the thing. The 2A and gun violence make it a political and socially sensitive topic, and changes the verbiage, but otherwise the same hobby trends apply.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago (5 children)

As the War of 1812 showed "organized militias" kinda suck.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I fear it won't be organized militias like the US civil war. A force with armies, clear borders, is much easier to fight against.

It'll be more like the IRA. Lots of domestic terrorism, mostly acts committed by "lone wolfs".

And for what? Some orange turd? State's right to commit human rights violations?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago (18 children)

This idea that the US military is just gonna bomb Houston without the people in the Air Force saying, hey, wait a minute, I've got family there, is just stupid. If you think that US Civil War Part II is going to be over quickly and easily, without the same kind of grind that we had the first time, well, I've got some bad news for you.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

While you do have a point that is also how every civil war starts. People don't want to fight until they do. Lincoln was in command of the troops in south until he wasn't. Even Ceaser had some mutiny because civil war is not fun. Scary part is it happens anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson 14 points 10 months ago

72M? The fuq? Where is that number coming from? They can't even get support from more than 15 (some of the least populated) states in the USA, and as a resident of one of those states they definitely aren't unanimous for fucking Treason.

If anything, I better not catch those fuckers in the street or it'll devolve into a real good guy with a gun dilemma.

[–] graycube@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Most people I know who own guns do so because they are afraid of black people. Not because they are itching to join a rebellion.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You like to hang out with white supremacists?

I know probably a hundred gun owners since I have my own range, none of them own firearms because they're afraid of black people... considering about half of them including myself are POCs...

You're statement which is false as fuck just makes you sound like a racist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief 12 points 10 months ago

What's funny is that the people who are most into this ideology are also the "Screw you, got mine"s that will snitch on coworkers and rat on neighbors to the HOA. But claim the government is always evil.

Later they drive like they own the road and bully other drivers on (sub)urban streets, while poofing coal-black exhaust from their double-wide trucks and oversized SUVs decorated with skeletal middle fingers and American flag punisher skull window stickers. Let's add truck nuts into this picture too, it's statistically not-unlikely.

They have some fantasy that a bunch of self-absorbed hyper-individualist misanthropes just like them are going to somehow cohesively band together to fight...the federal government...over... petty stupid things like manufactured culture wars...so that they can achieve a miserable little hate-driven utopia...? Do I got that right?

Meanwhile, neighborly, responsible, quiet, trained, community-minded gun owners will gladly organize amongst themselves to aid inevitable victims of all this nonsense, and would fare a heckuva lot better as a group.

They're the ones that would make foreign invaders or overstepping republics think twice.

These arterial-grease-ridden LARPers are being used so hard and they think it's all their idea.

As their disgraced and treasonous Great Leader(TM) might tweet:

"SAD."

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›