this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
833 points (99.2% liked)

Comic Strips

12744 readers
2947 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: Instagram

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] 342345@feddit.de 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're right. It seems to be a link.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What is this a Magritte appreciation thread?

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Are you at the dentist?

[–] palordrolap@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Picture this: The Magritte painting depicted here with the apple replaced with a poop emoji, and the whole painting with the caption Mashitte.

Now that I've typed this out, I'm not sure I like the idea, but it would still be art.

[–] MacNCheezus 14 points 10 months ago

Ooh, this Mashitte, this Mashitte

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This comic makes me sad. Magritte is great, but I don't know where, "The Son of Man" is located. Every time I search the only thing I find is "Private Collection".

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I THINK that might mean that it's located in a private collection.

[–] MacNCheezus 5 points 10 months ago

Inconceivable!

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Well it's not in my private collection, so now you have one less place to look.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Wait, the ~~picture~~ painting of a guy with apple in face really exists?

Here, print it out. Originals are only for making money anyway.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I highly encourage you to seek out the original paintings and other artistic mediums in museums when you have a chance. It's not about prestige, authenticity, or clout. It's about gazing upon relics that have somehow survived the test of time and gleaming a bit of the creator's intentions and skill. It's a human connection that can stretch the breadth of millennia.

Also I used to fix printers so now I have undying hatred of them. I buy quite a few art books though.

Edit: One thing photos, digital image files, and other means of reproduction of most paintings never seem to get right is the texture. Remember a painting is not flat, it's still a 3rd dimensional object. Painting techniques can layer paints giving them texture, it's a visual quality that is hard to appreciate when not in person.

Ah trickster rules. We're in fey territory.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Great, this finally explains why there's a difference between "a" and "the".

The question is incorrect. He should've asked "can I take the picture". And would've obviously received a no.

I don't go to parties.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He could mean "one of the pictures" and then the phrasing would be correct.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I don't see any other pictures in picture. Although, given the context of an art gallery, this would probably make sense.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There could be multiple pictures. And he chooses to take this one.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Even if there is only one picture, it is still a picture, so the question is still grammatically correct. It's just deliberately ambiguous. I am taking this stand.

Knocks over a statue and walks away with the stand

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

That's a painting not a picture, your semantics have failed you

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My counter argument: The Picture of Dorian Gray

It seems the word picture at the very least used to be used for paintings as well, so it's more that it's just an uncommon usage. Maybe the guy is a time traveler.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

Or Pictures at an Exhibition (wikipaedia link) by Modest Mussorgsky?

(Especially the Emerson, Lake & Palmer version) (Youtube link)

In the UK at least, "Picture" is totally fine shorthand, even today, to refer to a flat 2D thing that might be put on a wall in a gallery, whether it be a painting, drawing, photograph etc. More formally it would tend towards being a figurative (rather than abstract) work.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The whole thing is drawn, how can you tell it's not a picture?

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Because it's a representation of an actual painting, but if we're going to be overly semantic then I give up. You win

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's pixels. I'm holding my phone

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's light traveling from your phone to your eyeballs.

Then it's neuronal signals to your brain.

OMG it's abstraction all the way down, isn't it!? :-P

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those neurons are cells and they need the mitochondria which uses protein to make energy... so everything is just energy in some form or other

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And energy in turn derives from the sub-atomic level, which itself sits on top of the quantum, although some people say that it is all oscillations of n-branes... therefore do any words ever have any meaning, really, ever?:-P

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago

They are not birbs so... yes? They "are real" (wink):-).

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It happened! Someone said someone else won on the Internet.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but you lost...

The game

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You. Motherfucker.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure I like the picture you're trying to paint with this comment.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cartoonist hasn’t seen Airplane!

[–] MacNCheezus 1 points 10 months ago

Or maybe he has...

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Sinner man, where you gonna run to?