this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
102 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1150 readers
601 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I wish the FCC would just ban all robocalls instead.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Honestly I think that's reasonable. Automated messages can be text only. Restricting voice does not harm any legitimate business that isn't trying to trick people.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That'd be more on Congress than the FCC. But it would be nice.

[–] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

From reading the article, "pre-recorded" and "artificial" voices are already prohibited for unsolicited calls, so I don't see what this ruling would actually change other than a slight clarification. It's not like robocallers are actually prosecuted in any meaningful way.

It actually is prosecuted, but you have to file a complaint first.

The only catch is that it has to be from a domestic call center. They have teams whose sole job is preventing TCPA violations, because it's a few grand per violation, so it doesn't happen super often.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And that will get revoked come Jan by the GQP. A quick bullshit lawsuit about how it's against the first ammendment and corporations' free speech is hampered.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Ah yes, corporations' free speech, the ultimate goal upon which our fascist paradise is founded.

I hate this timeline.