this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
306 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2333 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

Some companies raised prices and made greedy money. And those companies don't want to lower the prices back.

Shameful.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Funny how out of touch, these questions are from the out of touch.

[–] Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What part of 6% mortgage and 9% auto loans screams "great economy" again?

[–] TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean neither of those is a problem, the problem is that prices aren't adjusting to match.

But housing won't go down because it's become an investment, and cars won't go down because during covid manufacturers learned only selling expensive models increases profit margins.

If anything, high rates are good. They encourage saving and curb consumerism, which are both things Americans at large can use help with.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] excitingburp@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Greedflation, but he has already commented on being concerned about it.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is the same as when Trump says the economy is great, its just great for stockholders. Biden knows this, hell half the people he's speaking to know this but will believe him anways. It's okay though, next time a republican is elected they'll go back to remembering that 'the economy' is just code for rich peoples investments. But not a moment before then, because they're utterly terrified of critisizing Democrats.

[–] Syringe@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I dunno. I don't really think they're connecting it. All of the messaging I'm seeing is around "hey. We did a great thing. Why aren't more people cheering us on?"

Biden has just started to go after food gouging, but hasn't really done anything about companies like Black Rock buying up all the housing and jacking up the rental and real estate markets.

But who knows. It's messaging from the white house, so it may or may not be misguided.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
[–] blargerer@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

By basically all metrics, the US economy is moving in the right direction. Its just in a really big pit on some of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


That disconnect looms large over Biden’s political prospects, with White House advisers and campaign officials acknowledging that how Americans feel about the economy could be decisive in determining whether the president can win a second term in November.

But one senior adviser to the president told CNN the one thing they have not offered Biden is a prediction for when the American public’s psychology about the economy will have meaningfully improved.

There is also a delicate balancing act for the president to execute: Touting economic progress while being publicly sympathetic to the reality that many Americans still feel burdened by high prices, including on rent, housing and food.

To that end, Biden has started testing out lines that point the finger at some corporations that he says are taking advantage of the fact that prices were at record highs for so long.

And as Biden addressed culinary union workers at a hotel cafeteria in Las Vegas on Monday morning, he pointed to a classic American candy bar to gripe about shrinkflation.

A recent New York Times op-ed by the chief economist of UBS Global Wealth Management that used the price of Snickers bars to examine why so many Americans are still unhappy – despite falling inflation – had caught the president’s eye.


The original article contains 858 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

You can never be critical enough on the party that supposed to represent the people doesn't do a fucking thing to help. Fascism vs. indignation. What a fucking country we live in.

[–] HATE_CENTRE@mstdn.social 4 points 9 months ago

@return2ozma That's not my economy.

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The reporting on the economy is very much in line with the sentiment "The surgery was a success. Unfortunately, the patient perished." Different metrics matter to different people. Food prices climbed faster than gas or housing, so inflation feels high (we have to make different choices to afford to eat), but it's not actually as high as it feels.

The employment rate (yes, that one, not the unemployment rate) is still not great, and lots of companies in the tech sector are tightening their belts to try to deliver on the sky high expectations they've been selling. The whole thing looks hollow.

[–] steakmeout@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

That article seems like utter bullshit designed to make Biden seem out of touch. There’s no proof, it’s all hearsay about him supposedly seeking questions from his advisors. What is CNN’s angle here?

[–] Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Mandate WFH for companies that have proven they can do it especially for those of us who would rather die than be in a room full of people.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›