this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1216 points (99.9% liked)

Memes

45662 readers
955 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nitrate55@lemmy.dbzer0.com 174 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We referring to teachers as "it" now?

Damn. Underpaid and dehumanized all at once. That's gotta be rough.

[–] zaros@zaros.club 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pfft, rest of the world should start following Finns on this and call everyone and everything 'it'! Except pets for some reason.

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

I know a guy who calls people "se" and things "hän"

[–] Kleysley@lemmy.fmhy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

As a non-native speaker, referring to a single teacher as "they" is not very intuitive (although correct)...

[–] LedgeDrop@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Um.. How about "... their money..."?

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This guy englishes

[–] zaros@zaros.club 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I very much agree. Learning English as a foreign language, it feels very wrong to use plural for a single person. I'm still not quite used to it! Although, had I been taught that early on, I doubt it would feel any weirder than using "you are" for a single person.

[–] SolarNialamide@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Funny, English is also my second language but in my first language 'she' and plural 'they' are the same word, only distinguished by the verb, so it never seemed that weird to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DevilishOxenRoll@lemmy.kyryli.uk 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that's actually a pretty recent development. Less than a decade ago, I remember getting marked down in English class for using "they" as a genderless singular pronoun, as my elderly teacher grew up only ever using "they" to refer to a group.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

This use of singular they had emerged by the 14th century, about a century after the plural they.[4][5][2] It has been commonly employed in everyday English ever since and has gained currency in official contexts. Singular they has been criticised since the mid-18th century by prescriptive commentators who consider it an error.[6] Its continued use in modern standard English has become more common and formally accepted with the move toward gender-neutral language.[7][8] Though some early-21st-century style guides described it as colloquial and less appropriate in formal writing,[9][10] by 2020, most style guides accepted the singular they as a personal pronoun.[11][12][13][14]

Your teacher was just one of those purists and it was never something with strong consensus for being wrong.

[–] TofuSauce@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Shakespear used they as a singular iirc

[–] potpie@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

And Chaucer split infinitives, but I was always told it was "wrong" in gradeschool. That's the problem with pedantry: language is a fascinatingly complex and beautiful set of patterns. Boiling it down to rules is at best a handy style guide for formal writing, but at worst it gets weaponed as a way to discriminate against people who use lower prestige dialects.

[–] DevilishOxenRoll@lemmy.kyryli.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's true, and there is evidence of "they" being used as a singular as far back as over 700 years ago, but only within the last few decades has it been formally accepted by style guides, like the APA or the Chicago Manual.

[–] sauerkraus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find it most inconvenient when “they” is used to refer to one person and a group in the same paragraph.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is that any different than when you have two people of the same gender and suddenly can't use plain old gendered pronouns to unambiguously refer to the two people?

Eg, if Susan took Anna's apple, it'd be confusing to say "she took her apple".

[–] sauerkraus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah pronouns can get really messy. I try to avoid them as much as I can in technical writing so I can follow my own sentences lol.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not plural though. It's just the third person neuter pronoun. Singular "they" has been a thing in English for centuries, and has only been controversial among a small segment of the population for a very short time.

Think of it a bit like French "vous". That's a "plural" (second person) pronoun, but is also used in the singular. In the French case, it's used as a singular formal second person pronoun in addition to a plural second person pronoun. Nobody in France is getting up in arms about how you shouldn't use "vous" when talking to one person.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

is not very intuitive though

Yes it is. It's completely intuitive. Native English speakers do it all the time every day. The singular "they" is used literally without conscious thought. The only time it becomes controversial is with transphobes talking about specific people who do not identify with their gender assigned at birth. Even transphobes use singular "they" without thinking in contexts like this OP where the gender is unknown. (Which is why their "but it's bad grammar!" arguments fall flat.)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spidertongue@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"it's" own money? I'm assuming you meant "its" but even then your teacher is an object?

[–] antony@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't assume someone's pronouns. "It" is a safe bet these days.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Their" assumes they're still human though

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago

Pfft. Fucking speciesists.

[–] stratoscaster@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn robots teaching our children. They terk er jerbs

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It took yerr jyerrbs!!

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If they consent tho.... 😏

[–] drcouzelis@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone who thinks this has never hosted a birthday party for a bunch of grade schoolers. I get enough pizza so they can have a couple of full pizza slices each, they take a few bites, then immediately go back to goofing around with their friends.

Then I have leftover pizza for a long time. XD

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the joke is that a lot of us were little shits that didn't appreciate some of the only adults that cared to see us succeed.

True words, yet probably applies to every generation.
I have a handful of teachers who have had a great influence on my life and they were very happy that I reached out decades later to tell them so.

[–] StayFrosty@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

It's all about the intentions. Not the quantity.

[–] ayyndrew@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

For some reason those school party pizzas tasted so much better than normal

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like pizza always tastes a little better in social settings. Does anyone else feel that?

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Food should always be enjoyed with others

[–] Wooly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Forbidden fruit.

[–] vicfic@iusearchlinux.fyi 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So are we now just reposting all the old memes from reddit?

[–] jimmyjoners@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well I don't go to Reddit so it works for me. Down vote if you don't like it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 1 year ago

Kid me: Pizza is pizza.

Adult me: Pizza is pizza, unless it's Papa John's.

[–] dunkelmann@discuss.yussuv.com 8 points 1 year ago

It‘s not much but it‘s honest work!

[–] tho@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

i have never seen a meme this sad before

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I learned recently that teachers in my area actually make decent money. Not like.. Tech industry money, but for my area they make $30/h on the low end, $43/h median, and $52.60/h on the high end.

That's a decent living that most people don't experience. I'm sure some places are awful for teachers though.

[–] Wooly@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Based on the $ ima assume you're American and probably live in a high cost of living area, they get paid that much to compensate for high prices. They're probably as poor as the rest of us.

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Average wage in my area is around $30/h.

[–] Wooly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Windows2000Srv@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Future teacher here, my salary starts at 52$ CAD/hour, which is great! But I'm only paid for the time I'm in class, which is roughly 3h45 per day...

This pay doesn't include the time to prepare the class, the time to correct, the time to attend mandatory meetings on the lunch break. Finally, we don't have our vacation payed, so they split our pay to give us a salary during the summer (okay this last point is fair, but it illustrates that hourly salary in education is not representative).

[–] afa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was this not the top post of all time from reddit? Huh.

[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's not much.

But it's dishonest work.

load more comments
view more: next ›