A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
And America had inflatable tanks during WWII to take attention off of real units. I love dunking on the Russian military as much as the next guy but this is just a good common sense move. The enemy keeps striking your targets? Install fake targets, make their lives just a little more difficult.
Sir, as much as I like giving people the benefit of the doubt for trying their best I need you to really sit down with me and look at this picture.
They painted it to the fucking tarmac. It doesn't have shadows. It doesn't even have shading. It looks like they spilled some paint and thought "fuck fuck fuck try to make it into a plane shape before it dries!"
Additionally, nobody had advanced spy satellites in World War 2
Yeah just because this worked in the 40's when aerial surveillance was a new and rapidly changing technology does not mean it is a reasonable strategy now. Image intelligence doesnt fuck around, and between modern aerial tech, satellite imagery, and modern analysis techniques this could never be a valid strategy. Not to mention the insider knowledge of russian assests in sectors besides image intelligence. Dont mistake this for anything else other than sheer desperation and outdated methodology.
But they didn’t paint the tires on too. It’s just sloppy.
As more aircraft get taken out of commission, Russia's going to need more plane drawings.
I think were gonna need more paint…
these decoys cant be very effective with the intel ukraine is likely receiving
If you paint hundred fakes and one works, it's already worth the money spent.
The only way these work is if Ukraine's highest resolution recording device is 144p in which case I question the usefulness of their intelligence overall.
It just needs to look like a jet from afar.
The idea is to make the surveyor have to zoom in and validate each decoy, each and every time they would check the area. Sometimes they would have a jet parked directly on top of a decoy in the hope that the surveyor wouldn't zoom in and skip it thinking it's still just a decoy.
It is more of a psychological practice than anything else and pretty sure it related to or is change blindness
Are they to fool humans looking at the satellite image, or to fool warheads that are using image recognition for final guidance?