this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
74 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18977 readers
3628 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Should they even bother when the House won't do shit? I mean don't get me wrong, Ukraine desperately needs the aid, but until the House plays ball, they aren't going to get it, and Mike Johnson and Steve Scalise only care about doing the opposite of what Biden wants.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Jeffries has said that a discharge petition is not off the table.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't familiar with the term, but Wikipedia says-

In the U.S. House, successful discharge petitions are rare, as the signatures of an absolute majority of House members are required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discharge_petition

Which will absolutely never happen in this congress.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Republicans presently have only a one member margin in their majority. So, you are saying there are no Republicans that will vote for a foreign aid package. I don't think that's the case.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

2/3 of congress would need to vote for it. I really do not see that many Republicans willing to go along with Democrats right now.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actually, a discharge can move it out of rules. In any case, we'll have to see what happens.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They should do that with th border deal as a whole. JFC this Congress is a joke. Do nothing republicans.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Border security can't get through the Senate, so it really makes no sense to try the House.

A Joke, but not a funny one.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Mitch better whip his treasonous party into shape. I really wish their constituents would see that they're a disgrace and vote them out.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Other countries need to take of their own problems

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Ukraine is taking care of our problem for us, namely any threat from Russia. Aiding Ukraine is one of the best possible investments the U.S. could make in terms of tipping the global balance of power in America's favor.

But I suppose you think Putin is our friend and Zelensky is a Nazi.

[–] 0x029a 8 points 7 months ago
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Schumer just opened up the Senate floor on this Super Bowl Sunday.

“I can’t remember the last time the Senate was in session on Super Bowl Sunday...”

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Senate is working through the weekend on a $95.3 billion foreign aid bill with assistance for Ukraine and Israel, but it may still be days until a final vote as GOP Sen. Rand Paul continues to slow the process.

The chamber cleared a critical 60-vote threshold to advance the bill Thursday, took another procedural vote Friday night and held a floor debate on the legislation Saturday.

For his part, the former president also wrote Saturday on Truth Social that the US should stop providing foreign aid unless it is structured as a loan, illustrating the political pressure on Republicans to kill the legislation.

Senate Republicans are now divided over the foreign aid package, and some are pushing for amendments to make changes to the bill – including to add measures related to immigration and border policy.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Thursday that Democrats hope to reach an agreement with Republicans over amendments.

As the Senate continues its debate on the legislation over the weekend, advocates are calling on lawmakers to approve an amendment that would give Afghans who were evacuated during the US’ withdrawal of Afghanistan a path to permanent legal residency in the US.


The original article contains 578 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If I was a senator I’d be pissed off with all of these late night and weekend shenanigans. Can’t we just do this crap during the work day, M-F and skip the drama?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Schumer is in charge of the Senate work schedule. Since people like Rand Paul decided to slow the proceedings, he determined to push it though. This bill could have been passed Friday if it wasn't for Senators throwing up roadblocks.