this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)

urbanism

22540 readers
4 users here now

This was supposed to be c/traingang, so post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Trainposts highly encouraged

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kot@hexbear.net 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Is there anything more depressing than KKKhrushvite architecture?

Yes, letting people sleep on the streets.

[–] Galli@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

khrushchev-fist Is there anything more depressing than letting people sleep on the streets?

liberalism Hold my beer

[–] HarryLime@hexbear.net 27 points 7 months ago

That's Brezhnevite architecture, and the only problem with it is that they didn't build enough.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Aesthetic can come after the material needs of the people are sated

[–] Vingst@hexbear.net 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's not just looks. High rises have a negative effect to social and psychological health.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Things looking gross has a negative effect on social and psychological health generally but I'd prefer that over being homeless

[–] Vingst@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's a false dichotomy. High rises aren't even materially efficient. All that weight requires more reinforcing material.

The Vienna socialist housing projects are decent examples. Mostly mid-rises and their one high-rise isn't a spartan, drab eyesore.

It's not a trade-off, it's just shitty thoughtless design.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh? I'm no civil engineer so I can't argue against that lol. I always assumed high rise housing was primarily space and material efficient and that was the reason for their construction.

[–] Vingst@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

Yes, and also I think there are even better looking mid-rise Khrushchevka housing projects.

This "soulless highrise towers" meme is fraught toxic reactionary propaganda. I feel like I got little caught up and heated there.

[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

they have totally fair complaints

we can round up the people who complain about this and put them in laogai and give their newly vacated non-brutalist house to the nearest unhoused person