politics

bypass the social right of a child to the motherhood-fatherhood relation as an evolving biosocial relationship

the interrelated motherhood-fatherhood relation, resulting from the complementary function of man and woman in the process of procreation

So they are fighting for protecting a social construct that marxists historically want to abolish? This kind of arguments are strange to hear from the communist party of a country. I doubt that this can be considered a truly scientific or dialectical stance.

Don't know enough about Greek politics, but the arguments all seem pretty homophobic. The appeals to nature seem like rank idealism and "a child needs a mother and father" is the standard line for 'polite' homophobes.

We talk a lot about the benefits of democratic centralism and the problems of parties where individual members can do whatever they want, but this strikes me as a significant shortcoming of democratic centralism: what happens when your party comes down on the wrong side of an important issue? This would put members who opposed this internally in a tough spot of upholding the party line.

They're pushing against the commercialization of parenthood... but only in the case of gay people? Not homophobic at all.

Also certainly not on 4 or 5 layers of essentialism.

okay they make two points and neither make any sense:

1. a child needs two parents, one woman and one man for healthy development

this is argument is shit because its wrong. like, objectivley wrong. See here.

2. Adoption by same sex couples causes commercialisation of reproduction

which uhhh what are you talking about?

This need has an objective basis: the interrelated motherhood-fatherhood relation, resulting from the complementary function of man and woman in the process of procreation

what?

KKE is really bad at communicating the points they try to make, one of their CC members started out pretty strong here :

When asked about same-sex marriage and childbearing, Luisa Razou pointed out that the KKE leads the defense of the rights of same-sex people and does not make the sexual orientation of individuals, whether women or men, a reason for discrimination in their social life.

I agree, the issue is that basically nobody who isn't already wealthy can afford to live or even think about raising a family in the current situation.

... there is a certain disconnection of man from his objective determination and this creates greater and deeper distinctions and irrationalities with theories of gender construction.