this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
102 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2339 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I hate that Trump said that, and I deeply hope he loses in November, but I must say I am glad that one of the outcomes of that idiocy appears to be that Europe is actually, truly starting to take its own strategic and military security seriously.

[–] ralphio@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree with the article here that the increased spending has more to do with the Russian invasion. On the other hand Trump's comments on NATO in 2016 were where we saw NATO sentiment explode as people saw supporting NATO as resisting Trump. It really was key to rehabilitating the image of NATO after Libya and Afghanistan.

I think it’s a little of both, to be honest. Eastern Europe was taking things seriously since last February. Most of the rest of Europe took a while to really get their heads in the right place. There’s still a lot of work to do, though.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Who is talking about this lunatic. European nations are spending more on defence because of Putin, not Trump!

[–] Haven5341@feddit.de 8 points 9 months ago

It has nothing to do with Trump. Even theoretically that can't be the case European budgets haven't suddenly changed in the last couple of days.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

It probably is simply because of Russias aggression lately, more incentive to contribute and easier to excuse to the populace why you're increasing the spending. I highly doubt it's because of Trump's comments.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


German Chancellor Olaf Scholz declared on social media on Wednesday that his country would have the "highest defence budget" in Europe and would maintain the 2% target "in the decades to come... for safety and reliability".

Estonian intelligence chief Kaupo Rosin warned on Tuesday that Nato could face a "Soviet-style mass army in the next decade".

Speaking at a rally on Saturday, Mr Trump said he had once told a Nato leader he would not protect a nation behind on its payments, and would "encourage" the aggressors to "do whatever the hell they want".

The remarks were denounced as "dangerous" and "un-American" by President Joe Biden, and condemned by the Nato secretary general and German chancellor.

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 heavily influenced Western defence spending last year, and 11 countries were expected to have met the 2% target in 2023.

Seven more countries are likely to follow suit in 2024, and Germany's projected spending is set to climb to the equivalent $73.41bn (€68.5bn;£58.5bn), according to German press agency DPA.


The original article contains 645 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] filister@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What a stupid way to waste money, producing weapons capable of hurting other people because of politics and human hatred. One would expect humanity to have evolved beyond that point by now, but nope, we still produce nuclear bombs, and other weapons of mass destruction and we are one lunatic away from a real world nuclear war.