this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
124 points (76.5% liked)

Leftism

2115 readers
1 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tankies are against the rules here, if you are a moderator, you are supposed to enforce the rules, not remove them.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Since you chose to air this publicly, I'll respond publicly. I've been removing your undemocratic "rule" addition for a few reasons.

  1. We are a democratic community and as such all rules are voted upon. When you agreed to live our values, I made this post to ratify our rules. The comment I KNOW you're going to cite was posted a full week after the rules were ratified. It's wholly undemocratic and against the values of our community to just decide your rule is an exception and add it without seeking consensus. Here's a screenshot to jog your memory.

  2. The rules and posting expectations already ban the behaviors exhibited by people labelled tankies. This "rule" seems to be for your ego rather than any practical reason.

  3. "Mods have final say" is in regards to interpreting and enforcing the rules of our community. It does not excuse unilateral changes to the rules.

  4. As the only active mod, I can tell you with absolute certainty that tankies have not been a problem in this community. The lemmy instances people point to as being tanky are banned by LW and cannot interact with the community at all. The problem I've noticed are people denying the genocide of Palestinians.

Edit: I don't have any control in how you choose to handle issues in our community, I just react the way that seems most appropriate. That being said, I do want to find a solution here. I believe we should ban the behaviors of tankies, rather than leave it up to interpretation for what's allowed. We have a few options here; I'd prefer we make a metapost on amending the rules to whether we should explicitly ban support for totalitarianism or ban tankie discourse.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it helps if you make explicit that this is not a tankie space, they are not welcome, even if you understandably don't want a rule specific to tankies. Every leftist subreddit has been taken over by tankie mods and I don't want that to happen here

[–] Zstom6IP@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

This needs to be done.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Great response. Thanks for keeping things cool and professional, and respecting actually democratic values. I'm glad to see we had a great mod.

[–] Zstom6IP@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

the community didnt vote on those rules though.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

Edit: I don't have any control in how you choose to handle issues in our community, I just react the way that seems most appropriate. That being said, I do want to find a solution here. I believe we should ban the behaviors of tankies, rather than leave it up to interpretation for what's allowed. We have a few options here; I'd prefer we make a metapost on amending the rules to whether we should explicitly ban support for totalitarianism or ban tankie discourse.

I would certainly appreciate this. While I have significant problems with the pro-totalitarian ideology (I'm closest to anarcho-syndicalism - rigid hierarchy, trusting in a human with absolute power to act selflessly, and mass murder of dissidents doesn't sit well with me), when they are well-behaved and the toxic behavior disallowed, they can provide great discourse. I would echo others in stating that vigilance against the comm being subverted for totalitarianism is important but, do agree that the other rules really should cover the biggest behavioral problems.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 56 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To me, it looks like there are only 3 Mods here, and you are one of them.

@Zstom6IP@lemmy.world

@rockSlayer@lemmy.world

@Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social

So, it should be easy for the three of you to work out

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 54 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You know its an authentic leftist sub when pretty much the only thing that happens is pointless melodramatic infighting

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Noone fights against leftists more than other leftists, not even fascists.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Leftists and fascists are natural enemies, like leftists and neo libs, or leftists and other leftists. Damn leftists ruined leftism

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is it time to split? The leftist community can't coexist with the community of leftists after all, they have too fundamental differences. To not speak of the left vs sinister vs vänster divides

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No. Clearly, you're supposed to stick around and yell at people for their beliefs that are close to yours but not quite the same, belittle them, and generally be unpleasant. You get bonus points for ad hominems, ignoring context, and interpreting ambiguous things in a manner as detrimental to civil conversation as possible. /s

Really though, stick around, be civil, agree on things, disagree on others and strive to advance your understanding of personal philosophy and help yourself and others grow.

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We have a board game here in Sweden that makes fun of left parties and their tendencies to split over minor issues. It was a huge problem for left parties. It's a rough race for "purity" I guess but keeps the parties small and makes it hard to get any kind of democratic impact when a party divides as soon as it reaches a critical mass. Nowadays most left parties are pretty stable but have deeply entrenched factions inside instead that sometimes focuses more on minutiae (?) rather than unity for the sake of the larger questions and policies.

https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/189423/splitters-nagon-djavla-ordning-ska-det-va-i-ett-pa

I guess I should have put an /s on my post :)

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 months ago

They is amazing. Thank you for sharing! I might have to get that one.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

https://youtu.be/XcPHG-ro3VA

Inb4 noncompete is a tankie too but that doesn't mean this video isn't pure gold. Beavis Stirner lol

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Fuck tankies

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Don't you guys have a way to talk to each other? I'm a mod in two communities. We talk on Discord privately to make decisions like this.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 9 months ago

Private drama?

What's the point of that?

[–] Zstom6IP@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

DMs in lemmy dont work well.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zstom6IP@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We do need to make a discord.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There already is a Lemmy.World Discord server you could piggyback off of. I don't want to tell you how to get there because I don't want to get in trouble for it, but send a message to @Thekingoflorda about it.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

my opinion is tankies (mostly) aren't real.
they're just shills and trolls acting in a particularly extremist way... the former, in order to make communists/socialists look bad.
people don't actually want a Stalin-style brutal dictatorship... but if they act like it, it validates all the anti-communist red-scare bullshit...
they should be banned... all they ever do is talk shit to/about people...
they're fake af
see also: h3xbear (misspelled to avoid the dogpile)

[–] protist@mander.xyz 16 points 9 months ago

I live in a pretty big city that's pretty liberal, and have never once met anyone who thinks like the typical poster on that instance. We did have someone who was spraypainting Stalinist statements in red across random buildings awhile back, but it turned out to be a woman who had encountered some mental health challenges.

That instance is crazy as fuck....they'll drop pro-Putin propaganda and then claim to not like him, and they'll completely ignore how utterly capitalist China has become while singing Xi's praises, all while screaming "death to America" and saying Iran is a better model for society than any European country.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tankies are absolutely real. I've met folks IRL who are pro-USSR-under-Stalin as a model for society. The excuse used is that capitalist countries have a very real history of violently suppressing any leftist government attempt. This, of course, ignores that such governments commit the exact same abuses and reinforce the very cycles of violence that they rebel against in the first place.

That instance, in particular, is not a bunch of RWNJs cosplaying though. That's an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence and I think it is . With the size of the userbase, there would absolutely be at least someone caught bragging about it over the years. No. They're just run by people who either don't care about the toxic, divisive behavior, or actively encourage it (see: existence of the "dunktank" comm).

As for being disingenuous, absolutely. Those in power there are definitely authoritarian first and Leftist second, if ever and they condone users creating conflict with fellow leftists to feed their dopamine-rush cravings. Dissent or providing historical information that comes anywhere close to implying that the USSR, China, or Russia are not free of any blame are met with bans - as bad as r/con on that now (I caught a ban for stating that historical evidence does not support the claim that Finland is being critical of Israel due to anti-semitism and that Stalin's invasion of the sovereign nation that had historically been oppressed by Russia was both unnecessary and could have been predicted to push the Finns to seek help from the Nazis to maintain their independence - and things about the Winter War and Continuation War not being black-and-white, or that Stalin was happy to divide up the world between himself and Hitler until Operation Barbarosa did not go over well either). They were on much better behavior when first federating but I don't but their Leftist-unity or use of Dialectics anymore (it is impossible to exercise Dialectic reasoning when embracing willful ignorance and suppressing anything that could be antithetical to one's thesis).

All that said, there are some good folks there that I'm sad to no longer be in communication with. People that, more often than not, I disagreed with but were great to converse with to explore the "why" of such disagreements and they did so with nothing but good faith. It is genuinely disappointing that there toxicity is allowed.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

well i did say "mostly"
obviously a few of them are genuine...

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 9 months ago

You did indeed. Personally, I'd wager that a good portion are genuine in their convictions. I'd caution against the temptation to dismiss them as right-wing wreckers as there is danger of hitting a "no true Scotsman" fallacy and failing to register and own problematic ideas and history in our "house".

In order to sustainably progress towards improving the human condition, it's important that we be honest with ourselves as Leftists and humanity at large. Our shit does indeed stink and living in denial doesn't make the smell go away. Facing up to the bad things, taking collective responsibility, and resolving to mitigate potential harm is important, from my perspective.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I just got banned from that place. I got into an argument about how even though Biden is a scumbag genocider, I think it's morally correct to vote for him over the alternative. I got called a fascist, told I support genocide, told that if they knew me they would beat me and told that when the revolution comes I would be killed, and then they posted a emoji of a place were Nazis were slaughtered. When I tried being open and saying I was not in a headspace to change my mind right now, but that we are still comrades, I was then attacked even harder.

They told me that i should consider why my fellow leftists were being so mean as a sign that I should change. I asked why they were being so mean, it's just a small argument about voting. They said I was Nazi scum who deserves to die and if I was really a comrade I would change my mind immediately.

I genuinely tried to talk to them still through all that. Albeit I was emotional. All I wanted was to end the conversation with a sort of show of solidarity despite our disagreements. I was then inundated with more threats and insults to my character.

Honestly I'm new to lemmy and it looked to be a safe space for leftists like me. I know I shouldn't let it effect me, it's the Internet after all, people are dicks. But I just had so much more... Expectations of that place. I really thought it'd be different. Instead I was torn apart and banned. Now I'm emotionally compromised for the day and couldn't sleep. Unfortunate.