this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
135 points (87.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Biden is old. Trump is a traitor. There. Fixed it for you.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump would be a traitor AND the oldest elected president ever.*

Biden was the oldest president ever elected. Trump is 3 years younger than Biden. If Trump theoretically wins, he'd be the oldest elected president ever beating Biden by a year.

Thank God he will be in prison. I just hope a judge finally revokes his bond after making jokes about fleeing to Russia to get pegged by Putin.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I will take old over corrupt any day.

Next?

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's absolutely insane that this is even being debated. Biden could keel over tomorrow and he would still make the better president.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump is all four. I wish we wouldn't turn every election into a years long grueling horserace.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Two out of four is still pretty bad...

We shouldn't be satisfied with "better than trump" because that's roughly 99% of the population.

Unfortunately we don't get a choice, and the people not letting us have a choice are too stupid to realize why voter turnout is constantly shit.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We shouldn’t be satisfied with “better than trump” because that’s roughly 99% of the population.

Spend some more time with his voter base and you'll bump that figure down a bit

load more comments (1 replies)

You're basically right; They're actually smart, but not in a nice way and not that smart. First past the post voting essentially guarantees this dynamic; duopoly a la Good Cop Bad Cop.

They know they can skate by on that, but they're not afraid enough of the fact that the insurrection has not ended, and will only escalate. Their Bad Cop isn't a method actor, but an actual bad cop who already has a drop piece with their name on it.

Fascism has never yet been defeated without an actual fight. This time isn't different.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right, Biden is an old and decrepit 80 while Trump is a young and virile 77.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

He's quite spry. Watch how he runs from the law.

[–] iMastari@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Biden is old. Trump is old, corrupt, and a traitor.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you don't vote Trump will likely win because old people do vote and most will vote for Trump. So get out and vote against Trump at least.

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This old fuck will never vote for that Putin-sucking, diaper-filling-while-denying-it, corrupt asshole of a traitor, but I agree with your message.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seraph@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The only reason why I have a hard time believing that's true is that he barely won last time and he's burnt a lot of bridges since then, not to mention killed a lot of his constituency with COVID.

Not saying you're wrong I just can't wrap my brain around it.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We couldn't wrap our brains around Trump winning the first time. Just vote in every election.

[–] norbert@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll repeat it in case anyone has missed it.

JUST VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION.

We have to go vote in every, single, election. The right spent the last 70 years cultivating a base full of ignorant bigots so they'd turn out to vote against black people and hippies. They even got hateful fuckers to run for boring things like school boards and city councils. That shit paid dividends for them as we're all witnessing today with a gerrymandered congress and school boards deciding they're not going to teach things because the truth hurts their feelings.

The only way we win long term is to go vote in every single election and drag the country back to the left (the real left, not the current crop of milquetoast corporate-democrats) so we can have a real conversation about things that really impact peoples lives, like ranked choice, wage theft, national healthcare, and UBI.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Can we please get a non-fascist under 50?

Please?

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (11 children)
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

She won't meet the minimum requirements before 2024.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Minimum is being 35 and she'll hit that 23 days before the election:

October 13th, 1989.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

John Stewart is over 50, but he would be a great option IMHO.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago

Trump is just about as old as Biden. A distinction without a difference.

[–] c0c0c0@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Neither of those words really need to be in quotes.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wonder if Biden's age helps him to some extent, since if that's the only bad thing you can think of while the other guy is "corrupt" that doesn't seem so bad to me. If he wasn't old maybe you'd see the "typical politician" criticisms like "phony" or something.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Not even a little bit.

Biden's age isn't just a number. The guy really acts very, very old.

Even when he gave the speech in response to the court striking down student loans, when he was all fired up, and announcing some pretty powerful policies... even then he just seemed so sleepy and low energy.

Trump, for all his many, many, many, many disqualifying flaws, still seems feisty and energetic in comparison.

That said, Bernie Sanders is even older, but I'd vote for him even if he were on his deathbed. Bernie Sanders' corpse would do a better job representing the people than would any Republican, and 90 percent of Democrats.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying it's not a bad thing, but it crowds out some other bad thing that people would feel about him instead.

Sure Trump seems more energetic, he would win in a how-old-do-they-seem competition, but in a who-should-be-president competition I'd rather have someone slow in his competence vs energetic in his corruption.

Probably the next-worst thing wouldn't be that Biden's corrupt but conceivably it could be worse than just being old.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›