this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
211 points (90.7% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4580 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] livus@kbin.social 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Brb.

Can't believe his campaign thought they should venture in there. Tiktok is home to the generation that doesn't watch cable news and hasn't yet been brainwashed that it's somehow okay to genocide children.

Edit. Yep some of them have been scrubbed all the way to a few anodyne comments saying shit like "you've got my vote mr president" but a lot of them are still flooded with creative ways to filter evade with Rafah and genocide references. Gonna give an intern repetitive strain injury.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

if someone could take a bullet for the team, install that malware, and try to convince them about civil resistance that would be great.

[–] Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You give too much credit to tiktok kids. They were running themselves over with their own cars just a few years ago.

Even their advocacy is a fad.

[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

And so did idiots 25 years ago ghost ridin the whip

I do think the tide pods thing was unique to tik tok

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

As far as I know, there were very, very few cases of anyone actually eating a Tide pod. Like single digits.

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

@Arcane_Trixster not "giving them credit" just pointing out that their media consumption practices are not the same as older generations and that has given them a different perspective.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago

Boomers vote for Trump and Biden you can't get dumber than that.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 8 months ago

Use your words, FFS.

[–] livus@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

@Hyperreality fair point and China censors the hell out of its genZ. But China's method is to brainwash people that what it's doing in Xinjang somehow isn't happening.

Bombing Gaza is much harder to hide, so the party line becomes "it is but it's ok because reaons".

As far as I could see Tiktok was censoring things involving Palestine as well which is why a lot of FYP content is about watermelons.

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

I don't know what the fuck they were expecting?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I thought we were discouraging use of TikTok sue to Chinese influence, especially for government use. Why is Biden using it?

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Because it is the new tool presidents all over the world are using to reach younger audiences whenever they want to win the elections.

[–] shuzuko@midwest.social 11 points 8 months ago

Because unfortunately, you have to meet the ~~customers~~ voters where they are. You're not gonna reach gen z with cable ads anymore.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

He's not using it for government use. He's using it for campaign use, to campaign to voters who are on TikTok.

[–] Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They don't want the app on government issued work phones.

These boomers are free to dance and talk about their favorite cookies all they want on their private devices.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

To be fair... Government devices should be locked down. They're not personal devices.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fuck tik tok. He should have a mastadon instance.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t they remove TikTok from government phones? I feel like that’s something that happened?

[–] NotAtWork@startrek.website 10 points 8 months ago

yes, it's also illegal to use government phones for campaign purposes, so it's fine to use TicTok on a campaign owned device.

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 14 points 8 months ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


President Joe Biden launched a TikTok account this week to connect with young voters, and the pro-Palestinian protests that have beset his recent in-person events are now following him online.

Since then, pro-Palestinian demonstrators have confronted Biden at a campaign stop in Michigan, chanting “Genocide Joe.” And protesters calling for a cease-fire in Gaza have waited outside Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s home to have their gripes heard.

But speaking to NBC News just a few hours after posting her comment, Niusulu said Biden can still regain her vote so long as he sanctions Israel, cuts off aid and reigns in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Jack Lobel, 19, the national press secretary for Voters of Tomorrow, a nonprofit young-voter engagement organization, said the humanitarian crisis in Gaza still hasn't shifted the "fundamental choice" of the 2024 election.

In 2020, she encouraged her friends to head to the polls and vote for Biden and for Rep. Ruben Gallego, the Democratic congressman from her district who’s now vying for independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s seat.

Calling Israel’s ground offensive in Gaza a “genocide” is controversial, with various experts opposing that view and the United Nations’ high court in the Netherlands hearing a case on the issue.


The original article contains 886 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago
[–] TakiMinase@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago

Dikcok is a superior propaganda platform pushing social decay.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

More like the pro-Trump bots found his TikTok page and are astroturfing it with "Genocide Joe" copy pasted everywhere.

Otherwise left leaning people can't honestly be that stupid to try and deter others from voting for Biden because of the Israel/Palestine thing. As crazy as it is, there are bigger issues at play here. Palestinians are a human sacrifice by the ruling class.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

liberals when other liberals dare to criticize their choice of president for funding a genocide

Why do you people insist that targeting Biden for his poor policy somehow equates to supporting Trump?

Not saying anything in hopes that Biden wins by removing pressure or deterence is called bootlicking. You are bootlicking his current policies simply because you want him to win, and not because you want him to change or improve anything which he won't do if he doesn't receive pushback.

This is as dumb as conservatives thinking that not targeting landlords will magically reduce rent because the better landlords will naturally take hold