this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
195 points (84.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9602 readers
946 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pros of golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) replacing all private cars within a city:

  • Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn't a viable suburban commuter vehicle, meaning you'll probably only take it to the nearest transit station
  • Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn't likely to kill people
  • Excellent visibility, so less likely to run over children
  • Much smaller and lighter, so building parking garages for park-and-rides would be a lot cheaper and less objectionable than with our current style of cars
  • Electric
  • Smaller batteries than jumbo EVs
  • Compatible with dense, transit-oriented city development
  • Could be installed with mandatory speed limiters

Cons:

  • Less profit for GM and ExxonMobil
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 8 months ago (10 children)

The reason cars became so popular in rural areas is that they're the thing that allows people who live there to be connected with their neighbors. They divide densely populated areas and connect low population areas. The relationship cars have to people's lives is incredibly complex and putting forth solutions like this will alienate people from joining the movement. Advocating for walkable cities makes sense because rural communities aren't going to be atomized by regulations like that, and thus it becomes easier to implement.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 22 points 8 months ago (19 children)

This post is talking exclusively about cities, I'm not sure why this argument about rural areas comes up so often when it's not relevant.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

allows people who live there to be connected with their neighbors

Why do you say that? Losing connection with community is the exact reason the Amish ban cars. You rested your whole argument on this, too, so you'll need to convince me a little harder that up is down.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You've just proven their point. Isolationists ban cars.

The Amish isolate themselves from others for religious reasons. Most people don't want to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Skua@kbin.social 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is a small city in Georgia, USA that does this. Tom Scott video on it

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I knew a guy that grew up there, he wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed and was kinda shocked that all the other folks we worked with (most of us from other parts of Georgia than Peachtree City) didn't have golf carts growing up. Actually seems like a cool idea, although it only works if you can afford a golfcart

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tbf, the current system only works if you can afford a car which is typically more expensive than a golf cart

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

True, but all these people also have both, often multiple of both, it's a pretty well off part of metro Atlanta

[–] Iamdanno@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Needs AC & Heat & Doors/Windows. Weather is a thing that people need to deal with. Not everywhere is 70 and sunny every day.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah I find many of these not car cars have a very narrow used case, making them impracticable to scale.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Never change fuckcars, never change.

Every post on this forum is an S-tier masterclass in trolling, and I love it.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Already exists, Citroen Ami. It's a neat little idea. If you live in buildings, dozen apartments might have 3 vehicles always ready to go. Your key is your phone, as is your dashboard and the rest of the instrumentation. With range of 50 to 70km, it's good enough to run around the city for the day and get it charged over night. It's an interesting concept which people are not going to swallow because they need 6T coal rollers.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

My state allows towns to decide if they'll allow golf carts to drive on roads. It's great for small towns with lots of older people.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago
[–] Delphiantares@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Just based on the picture, do you expect this to be used anywhere that gets a decent chance of snow in the winter?

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

People still walk in those places too.

Give it some vinyl doors and you'll be fine in winter time.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This used to be my point against winter bicycles, but when I think about it, these kinds of individual transports shouldn’t be used for long distances anyway, and you’ll still need good winter clothing for walking to the destination after parking anyway.

I just decided to improve my winter gear, and that means I can walk, or bike, or use one of these electric golf carts, or whatever I choose.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. I'm in Canada, and I often ride my electric scooter to work in the winter, and many ride bikes in the winter here, too. The windshield on a glorified golf cart plus proper winter clothing is all you really need, although maybe detachable side flaps to keep out the wind might help, too.

And I wear full coat in a car anyways for the exact reason you mention: I still need to walk between car and final destination.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Just get the AWD trim with a winter tire package. Keep chains handy too

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn’t a viable suburban commuter vehicle, meaning you’ll probably only take it to the nearest transit station

So it's less practical than a bicycle and still encourages a sedentary lifestyle.

Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn’t likely to kill people

Still more likely than a bicycle, without the advantages of a bicycle

Excellent visibility, so less likely to run over children

But not perfect, which a bicycle has

Much smaller and lighter, so building parking garages for park-and-rides would be a lot cheaper and less objectionable than with our current style of cars

Bicycles are so small that you can take them into your apartment, completely nullifying the need for infrastructural storage accommodation near your home.

Electric

You will have to explain this, as it is not an inherent pro of a vehicle to have electrical propulsion.

Smaller batteries than jumbo EVs

Electric bicycle has even smaller battery, still!

Compatible with dense, transit-oriented city development

Less so than a bicycle

Could be installed with mandatory speed limiters

So could regular cars

=======================

You've built a solution that compromises on all the advantages of either and doesn't excel in any.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Some people have never had to balance two massive bags of chicken feed and a propane tank on a rusty bicycle with a bent wheel and it shows.

[–] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 34 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Some people also don't have physical disabilities or family members with them, and it really shows. Bikes are great, and we absolutely should be encouraging bike use, but the automobile is, frankly, a necessity for millions of people. We shouldn't be getting rid of wheelchairs, either. I swear, sometimes I feel like the fuck cars community is basically anprim. Yes, fuck cars, yes fuck car culture, but jimminy crickets they're not evil. Our use of us them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wolfruff@pawb.social 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

you can attach a trailer/carrier to a bike for that reason if you need to

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 months ago

You will have to explain this, as it is not an inherent pro of a vehicle to have electrical propulsion.

It is when the vehicle is small & light like this.

Heat engines get more efficient with increasing size. Piston count can be increased (improving balance), or piston displacement can be increased (reducing friction, heat loss & gas leakage per unit volume)

Batteries on the other hand get better with decreasing scale, the net distance from source to sink is decreased so it needs less wire. The total number of elements is reduced so risk of fire is as well. The battery is more replaceable, so aging is less of a concern.

Range compounds the effect. Typically smaller vehicles have smaller ranges, and that's good for electric where the engine is much lighter than the fuel, but bad for ICE, where the engine is a massive brick of iron and the fuel can just be a couple jerry cans slung on the back

In cars, the trade-off is a hotly contested race, but you don't see many diesel skateboards or battery-powered containerships.

[–] lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The clear benefit to this over bikes is that it doesn't require balance. Balance is a common issue in the disabled.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And the ability to move a family

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sounds similar to a mobility scooter, but more practical for carrying much heavier loads.

I'd prefer a cargobike personally, but most of the ones I like are too heavy to move when you're not riding it, let alone with a 1/4 ton load. Those also can't fit into most apartments, you've got to leave them outside or in bicycle storage...

This kart/NEV thing kind of seems like a good compromise, with quadricycle vans possibly being an alternative option if you aren't carrying people

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I agree that a bike is generally preferable, but an NEV seems a good compromise for people who need to move multiple people at once or more cargo than a cargo bike can carry. Max one of these per household + bike for everyone + walkable, transit-oriented development seems like a suitable compromise that would be a significant improvement over the status quo.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago
[–] papabobolious@feddit.nu 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This looks incredibly American. As far as small vehicles go this is still roughly the size of a small car, granted it probably weighs less(d safer), but storing it still requires a fair amount of dedicated parking. An E-bike or even better a pushbike seems like a more reasonable choice then.

[–] XiELEd@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

tfw Americans realize that smaller cars were better all along

load more comments
view more: next ›