~~Rust is so brief it's not even listed~~ I can't read
Programming
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
It is there, its the 20th. I was searching for that as well.
It's interesting, the results here are way different than the Code Golf & Coding Challenges Stack Exchange. I would never expect Haskell to be that low. But after looking at code.golf, I realize it's because I/O on CG&CC is more relaxed. Most Haskell submissions are functions which return the solution.
Sidenote: I like the CG&CC method, it's semi-competitive, semi-cooperative.
- all languages welcome
- almost all users post "Try it Online"/"Attempt This Online" links
- most users post explanations under their submissions
- often people will post solutions beginning with "port of user1234's excellent Foolang answer" when there's a clever shortcut someone finds
- or people will post their own solution with "here's a solution which doesn't use user1234's algorithm"
- or people will add comments to answers with minor improvements
IMO It's geared towards what is the best part about code golf: teaching people about algorithm design and language design.
What, SQL is down the bottom?
im confused, c and c have header files that are super verbose, not sure how its so high up that list
Header files are optional, they duplicate function declarations to share between multiple files, but otherwise you could write c/c++/c# without headers... the compiler might just run out of memory.
Surprised by C# and Java. People always moan that they have too much boilerplate code and something else about how OOP sucks and that makes these languages too verbose, yet they're close to the top of the chart here for least characters used on average.
I think Java's verbosity has more to do with the culture than the language itself
I suspect this is more a symptom of "enterprise" design patterns than the language itself. Though I do think the standard library in Java is a bit more verbose than necessary.
This is why I only use machine code
Any idea how Scala would rank? I have a hard time thinking it'd end up far away from Ruby.
Why is sql so low?
It's probably not used much for code golf, except for when it can be leveraged for specific tasks in which it excels.
It would be interesting to see how this ranking changes if the goal is "very succinct, but not unreadable" or "most idiomatic" rather than the code golf incentive of "any arcane nonsense for 1 less char".
NO WAY php is more verbose than Java.
It is not, though. Not according to the graph.
Weird this is not the graph I remember having seen first time, The one I saw had python at the very top, have I commented on the wrong post ?
this one has python at the top
There are two images. One of them has Python as #1, the other doesn't.
Who tf uses OCaml. It was created by my alma mater, we hated studying that shit, it was invented for crazy people.
Seems quite nice compared to bloody scheme
I'm not familiar with code.golf but I wonder how whitespace is handled? I find python is very concise anyway, but I wonder how the white space is counted (single tab, four spaces for black, etc).
I hate Python 3 requires parantes for print. Python 2 accepted print 'hi'. Vs print('hi')