Increase it.
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
214 points (98.2% liked)
News
23320 readers
3377 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Motherfucker was defaming her again just last week at a rally in Michigan. 83m was obviously not punitive enough. Hope she sues him again.
She, through her lawyer, already announced they intend to, but as of earlier this week her lawyer said there wasn't quite enough as of yet.
Trump obviously won't leave it alone, though, so knowing her lawyer is looking for it means the next lawsuit is pending.
Doesn't defamation require damages? At this point how does Trump saying anything damage her more or less?
She can't have a normal life. She can't even get groceries be herself without being attacked
She's also not a "public person". She has more privacy rights because of it.
And no, she isn't just a "public person" because of the periodic defamation. No court would rule that breaking the law more reduces damages. (Maybe in Alabama?)
83^2^ sounds about right. And if they keep going, it keeps getting squared.
As much as I want trump to hurt, don't increase it.
For it to stick permanently, based on supreme Court case law, the amount needs to stay below a particular percentage. (I don't remember the specifics, legal eagle has a good video on this)
So if you wanna hurt the Cheeto, hope it stays below that amount.
Further, they don't have to increase it. Trump already opened his mouth again making disparaging remarks again after the verdict. He create grounds for a third civil suit. E. Jean Carroll can simply file suit for the third case and with a third verdict.
Best way to do it imo
whelp... now it's squared again.
(I realize... it'll never happen, but seriously. fuck this guy and his delaying tactics.)
Isn’t she already suing him a third time?
Her lawyers said "we're watching, we're listening" - so, knowing he who cannot keep his trap shut, we just need to wait.
is 'strong probability' a legal argument? kinda feels like nonsense
They need to argue that to get them to suspend it pending appeal. They can't argue for a suspension otherwise. That will get denied, but they've gotta try.
I think this, just like his NY one, are desperate attempts because he doesn't have the money and cannot find anyone to cover a bond for him. He knows the next step is they start seizing assets, and that's when we find out how over leveraged he is on all his properties.
Just a question as a ignorant European. From what I understand he is now a convicted rapist, right? Does that mean he is entered in the sexual offenders database that you have in the states?
No, he was not actually convicted of rape in a criminal court.
So even though a judge has called him a rapist he is not "legally" a rapist as he has not been found guilty of the crime of rape.
Criminal court is where you go when a DA is brining charges against you. Civil court is the place where you and I would go to settle a lawsuit.
He is legally a rapist now. Adjudicated by the court.
Just not criminally. (Yet)
He was close to getting nailed for child rape but he threatened and intimidated the victim out of testifying and she disappeared.
Thank you for explaining it. I still find it weird how it works, but ok.
He was sued CIVILLY. if he is convicted CRIMINALLY then he'll be registered as a sex offender
This is the U.S.A. Everything is weird.
I believe this was all done in civil court, not criminal.
Next week: Trump's lawyers say to judge, "Is defamation even really a crime? Can you stab someone with a defamation?"
Yeah I get this one about bed time a lot, too.