this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
413 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2117 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/9700996

Nvidia's AI customers are scared to be seen courting other AI chipmakers for fear of retaliatory shipment delays, says rival firm

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 167 points 8 months ago (5 children)

That should be your very first clue that Nvidia needs to be broken up into smaller, competing companies.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 32 points 8 months ago (5 children)

And CUDA forcefully open sourced.

[–] Mkengine@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago

Until then you can use ZlUDA

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 29 points 8 months ago
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Thank dog that their ARM purchase got torpedoed.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How do you imagine that would work?

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 48 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

Yeah, don't be unrealistic. We can't just have a group of competent individuals properly plan out how to dismantle a monopoly to allow for proper competition in the industry. If they don't hold onto their monopoly, how will we ever see technological advancements?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Limit them producing PCIe cards to low volume reference models and require their software to be open source to break that aspect of the lock-in, that's the two big things. As alternative to the latter, require them to have actual platform docs, right now they're not only providing the only compiler for their cards which is deliberately incompatible with everything else they're also making sure that noone else can get performance out of NVidia cards without excessive reverse-engineering, some things are even locked down hard via firmware signing. Splitting AI off from GPU would be a bonus.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 103 points 8 months ago (16 children)

Monopolies gonna monopoly. Fuck Jensen.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 51 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If only there were some sort of anti-monopoly laws that existed and were actually enforced…

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The FTC has at least been going after companies again, but their targeting priorities seem very strange. They seem to like picking impossible fights they can't win, rather than cases like these.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 8 months ago

Regulatory theatre

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Antitrust isn't about just a binary win or loss. A lot of the cases, the FTC/DOJ has been losing because of concessions made by the merging parties. By showing a willingness to fight on mergers, the FTC is influencing the structure of mergers where merging companies are now willing to specifically identify business units to be spun off or sold.

Microsoft/Activision agreed to terms that would prevent their biggest titles from going Xbox exclusive. The Court that allowed the merger to go through specifically cited public statements and legally binding contracts as part of the reason why that deal could go through. The willingness to fight forced Microsoft to preserve some level of competition.

And a lot of the other deals haven't gone through. The FTC successfully blocked the merger between Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster. The Nvidia/ARM deal was blocked. So was the Amazon/iRobot deal.

The smaller deals they've successfully blocked are also shifting the legal landscape on how courts view these deals. Nobody outside of biotech is familiar with names like Illumina/Grail, but that FTC win is a big deal for applying to a vertical merger between companies operating at different points of a supply chain, rather than a horizontal merger between direct competitors.

The heightened regulatory scrutiny is chilling mergers, even before they get to the point of FTC review, too. So there is some concrete effect here.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

I guess the monopoly has to be preserved, so that Mr. Jensen has pocket money for another leather jacket.

[–] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I did some contract work for nvidia a few years ago to build out a data center for a client in the domain of pharmaceutical research. I've never worked for any employer more hypersensitive and narcissistic than nvidia. They will waste your time and fire you on the spot if you voice any concerns.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Lol hilarious watching companies be ruthless then scramble to keep shit together since they only want to line exec pockets and don't tackle real issues

Fuck them, their customers, fuck their execs 🤞

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

I wonder who this riva^(md)l is.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

No way they would do something like that!

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Gaussian, the molecular modeling software company, liked to do similar shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›